iconLog In  |  Register

Foreskin stories: Pt. 2

As an adult actively avoiding procreation, I hadn't put much thought into the genital aesthetics of my potential offspring. Once I started interviewing subjects for Part 1 of this article it occurred to me the foreskinned friends answering my questions had absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of their penises. The majority of males circumcised in the U.S. undergo the removal of their foreskin within days of birth, leaving new parents faced with yet another decision to make regarding the future health and well-being of their child.

In the last decade the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Urological Association have issued statements recognizing the controversy surrounding the routine circumcision of infants and citing evidence of its potential benefits as well as harms.

In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics stated, "Existing scientific evidence demonstrates potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision; however, these data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision." The American Medical Association later affirmed, "Policy statements issued by professional societies representing Australian, Canadian, and American pediatricians do not recommend routine circumcision of male newborns." If the leading medical establishments no longer recommend what is now considered a cosmetic procedure, why are 60-75% of American male babies still circumcised every year? What medical advice and social assumptions lead parents to their final choice? Three young couples with interesting takes on the whole circumcision decision explain.

Weighing the options

Lynn, MBA (non-profit fundraising, 27) and Jack, JD (Lawyer, 28) have been married two and a half years. Lynn is currently 7 ½ months pregnant.

Emma Reaux: Were you planning on starting a family?

Lynn: Yes, we planned this pregnancy.

ER: Have you found out the sex of your little one?

L: We decided not to find out the sex when we had the opportunity.

ER: Why?

Jack: It will be a fun surprise when the kid is born. We use a gender-neutral nickname.

L: I am also not really interested in the big push toward gender-specific clothing and gear for infants either; it wasn't a concern to me to be able to have the perfect pink or blue something for the baby.

ER: Will you find out the sex before you give birth?

L: No, we do not plan to find out the sex even if we have another ultrasound.

ER: If you have a male baby, will you circumcise him?

J: Probably, although we haven't really reached a decision on this.

L: This is something we've been discussing recently.

ER: If you have a female, will you circumcise her?

L: I didn't even think this was an option in the United States. Even if it was, it is not something I would consider.

ER: It's illegal in the U.S.

J: I hate that both procedures share a name — they really aren't related at all, and it implies that the female version is somehow okay.

ER: What have you read or researched about male circumcision?

L: We've done reading on our own, reviewed information provided by our midwives and discussed circumcision with a childbirth educator. There are mixed messages about the health benefits either way. We learned about the procedure and its risk factors, about the percentage of those circumcised and about common reasons people may choose to circumcise or not.

J: [More research] is on the to-do list.

ER: What are the benefits and drawbacks to leaving your son's foreskin intact?

L: Some studies say that it is healthier to be uncircumcised, though the same has been found about circumcision. There can also be similar social benefits — if everyone in the locker room is uncircumcised, a boy may feel he fits in better if he is also uncircumcised. By choosing not to circumcise, you can avoid a painful procedure and its risks.

J: I have no idea. Maybe kids will make fun of him if that's not the standard thing to do in this area.

ER: What are the benefits/drawbacks to circumcising?

L: Again, there are mixed reviews out there about the health benefits. There is the benefit of father and son looking the same, as well as the social aspect. As far as disadvantages, the procedure and healing process can be quite painful. Some providers and insurance companies also consider it a cosmetic procedure. It may mean having an unnecessary surgery done depending on your provider's point of view or paying more out of pocket for your son's care depending on the insurance company's classification.

ER: Have you two disagreed at all about your thoughts on circumcision?

L: No. We both agreed that this was something we did not have a strong opinion on that we should research more before making a decision together. One of the biggest things we did agree on was that this is a decision for us to make together, not just one left to the father.

J: Both of us are pretty ambivalent about it at this point.

ER: If you have a boy, what do you think about the argument that circumcision is more sanitary and healthier over the lifespan of your son?

L: We have seen studies from reputable medical bodies that claim health benefits of either choice. Because of this, I don't personally feel that one or the other is definitively more beneficial from a health standpoint.

J: Could be true; could be false. It makes sense to me, but that doesn't make it right.

ER: What about the argument that male circumcision is a violation to, or mutilation of, the child's body and rights?

J: Also a good argument. But then, isn't jabbing a child with a needle a violation of the child's body and rights too? A parent must make decisions for the child.

ER: Why do you think circumcising males in our culture is acceptable, while female circumcision is considered mutilation and very controversial?

J: Circumcising males is acceptable because that is what has always been done. Female circumcision is not widespread in the U.S., so people are afraid of it. Plus, it reeks of male dominance and repression of females.

L: I think male circumcision grew out of both cultural practices and a belief about health benefits, so it is generally much more widely accepted. It is also more commonplace and thus more accepted. In my understanding, when female circumcision is practiced it is done as a punishment and often not in an ideal medical setting. I think the difference in intention is the biggest reason there is a difference in acceptance.

ER: Would you even be thinking about the genitals of your child if you knew you were having a girl?

L: Probably not.

J: Nope. But then, we haven't really thought about it much for the guy either.

ER: Jack, are you circumcised?

J: Yup.

ER: One of the main arguments I've heard in conversation about this issue is that fathers want their son to "look like them." How would you feel if your son's penis looked different from yours? For example, uncircumcised if you are circumcised?

J: Doesn't make a difference to me. It might take some more explaining if the kid is different, but I don't think that's a big deal.

ER: On a scale of 1-10, how important is the issue of circumcision to you if you have a son?

L: I think it is a very important decision for us to make. I would consider it at the upper end of the scale.

J: I'd say 1. But it's a decision that has to be made before the kid gets here, so in that light, it's very important.

ER: Do you think your decision could be swayed at the hospital?

L:  We've made a conscious effort to do our own research and make our own informed decision. We have also chosen medical providers who use a more collaborative model of care. While I don't think our decision can be swayed, I certainly think it is possible for others in different circumstances to receive pressure one way or the other that may influence their decision.

J: If we get it done, it won't be the first day. We'll wait until the first doctor's appointment, if possible.

ER: If you choose circumcision, how would you feel if something went wrong with the procedure and it maimed your son's penis?

J: Well, that would suck, wouldn't it? But we have to make a lot of decisions for our children, and you can't get caught up and feel guilty about each one. You just have to make the best decision you can at any given point and move on.

ER: If you decided against circumcision, what steps would you take to prepare your son for reactions he might get from other children or teens as he grows up?

J: I haven't thought about it. It'll be a while before I have to deal with that.

L:  Everything we've read indicates that only about 50% of boys are circumcised. While it's certainly more common for some races or religious groups where a boy may be more likely to encounter reactions for being different, this is a question you could ask either way. I don't have a plan for this quite yet, but I also think that addressing this goes to a larger issue — teaching children about their bodies and making it normal instead of shameful.

ER: What would you say to another expecting couple considering their options about circumcision?

J: It's not my decision. I have no opinions or advice on this issue.

L: I would encourage them to do research, talk with their medical team about their wishes and, if possible, choose a medical team that strongly supports their point of view. I think it is ultimately a personal decision.

Circumcised

Melody, MSW (25, Hospital Social Worker) and Jim, MBA (26, Sales) have been married 2.5 years. The couple welcomed their first child, Samuel, into the world in early December.

ER: When did you find out the sex of your baby?

M: At our 20-week ultrasound, but we had MD confirm it every ultrasound after that!

ER: Had you discussed circumcision prior to finding out the sex?

J: Yes, we just knew that we wanted to get it done.

ER: When you say you "just knew" what you wanted to do about circumcision, what do you mean?

M: We didn't consider not getting him circumcised.

ER: Why was circumcision the best choice for you two and your son?

M: Circumcision is done to reduce risk of infection and there wasn't a thought of us not doing it.

ER: Why do you think you researched the hell out of everything else, but this was an easy decision?

J: There was no question; we were going to get it done.

ER: What fears or concerns did you have about the circumcision process?

M: There are risks of the MD making a mistake and we wanted to make sure that we helped it to heal well. We did feel bad after they brought him back and showed him to us, like what did we do to him? But we know it was the right decision.

ER: If you had a baby girl, would you think at all about circumcision, or the cleanliness of her genitals?

M: No, we never knew that girls could have a circumcision.

ER: Why do you think more people are concerned about male circumcision in our culture than female circumcision?

J: It is the social norm.

M: In the locker room you don't have a girl notice if another girl is circumcised.

J: But with a guy, it is noticed or talked about.

M: Girlfriends getting together talking about their new love interest. It is likely to come up as a comment if he didn't have a circumcision.

Foreskinned

Rita, MS (27, PhD candidate) and her partner Jose, JD (27, Lawyer) have been together over 8 years. Rita gave birth to their first child, Rex, in November.

ER: When did you find out the sex of your baby?

R: During the usual time that they tell you, I think week 23?

ER: Had you discussed circumcision prior to finding out the sex?

R: No, we actually didn't talk about it until pretty late.

ER: Did you research circumcision during your pregnancy?

R: I took the Bradley class, which is a natural labor and childbirth preparation class. They gave us a few articles on circumcision and some arguments against it. I didn't look into it beyond that.

ER: What fears or concerns did you have about the circumcision process?

R: The whole process itself is kind of scary.

ER: What agreements/disagreements did you two as a couple have about circumcision?

R: Oddly, my husband didn't seem to care much one way or the other, he just supported my decision. I was expecting him to feel strongly about it, but he didn't.

ER: Is he circumcised?

R: No.

ER: If you had a baby girl, would you think at all about circumcision, or the cleanliness of her genitals?

R: No, and that was part of why I decided against it. I would never think of doing that to a girl (although I know they do it in some parts of the world) so why do it to a boy? I think our bodies come out the way they are meant to be, no need to be cutting parts off, boy or girl.

ER: Why do you think more people are concerned about male circumcision in our culture than female circumcision?

R: It just seems to have become one of those cultural norms, although I don't know how. I think originally it started off as a religious practice for Jewish families, but somehow it is now the standard practice even though there is minimal medical evidence supporting it.

ER: Tell me about your experience at the hospital once your son was born.

R: They just asked if he was going to be circumcised and I said no and that was the end of it. I did not feel pressured and was happy with our care.

ER: Have you thought about how not having him circumcised will impact him in the future?

R: I hope it will be a non-issue and should not impact him at all. If anything, I hope I've left him with some natural protection against zippers and other unpleasant things.

To learn more about the history of circumcision, and why its practice varies by country and culture, check out this informative site. A special thanks to all 11 participants for Foreskin Stories Part 1 and 2; I appreciate all of the enthusiastic cooperation and honest responses over the past several weeks of interviews!

4 comments

username

Matthew

#1

Also a good argument. But then, isn’t jabbing a child with a needle a violation of the child’s body and rights too? A parent must make decisions for the child.
 
Is the implication here that because jabbing a child with a needle is a violation of the child’s body and rights,  but we do it anyway,  then it’s OK to chop off the kid’s body parts? 
 
M: Girlfriends getting together talking about their new love interest. It is likely to come up as a comment if he didn’t have a circumcision.
 
I like how this couple can’t see past grades 9 through 12.  It’s as if their son won’t become an adult who will want to enjoy a healthy sex life.  Basically,  instead of “I want Timmy’s sex to be as pleasurable as possible when he grows up,“  we get “I don’t want the bullys to make fun of our special snowflake in high school.“

username

Restoring Tally

#2

ER: Had you discussed circumcision prior to finding out the sex?
J: Yes, we just knew that we wanted to get it done.

I just don’t understand why, supposedly intelligent people would do this. Is it because circumcision has become so ingrained in the US culture that people cannot comprehend anything different? Or is it that there are too many sheeple out there who cannot apply critical thinking to a subject?
ER’s questioning about what the son may think later is very telling. I have met many young men restoring their foreskin and they resent that their parents had them circumcised at birth, particularly since there was no overwhelming reason to cut off part of their sex organ.

username

JP

#3

I think some parents are under the assumption that a baby / young boy who is uncircumcised requires a lot of genital manupulation to ensure cleanliness. Nothing needs to be done to the foreskin, as it doesn’t even begin to retract until puberty.  Around puberty, there is a bit more involved in teaching boys who are uncircumcised about hygiene (once erections begin, the foreskin should be pulled back and the head of the penis cleaned).  I’ve heard that many of the health issues related to men with intact foreskins may be related to hygiene practices, or lack thereof.  As a side note - I’ve heard that men who are uncircumcised have greater sensitivity on the head of their penis than men who are circumcised, as the tip of the penis is covered and protected from everyday friction.  My son is uncircumcised, and we have no regrets.

username

Andrea

#4

This is a great article! I am a maternity nurse and so many parents don’t research circumcisions pros and cons. They’ll spend days picking out the right nursery patterns and diapers, but they don’t give a second thought to SURGERY their child might go through!
There are pros and cons to everything and in the case of male circumcision, I have seen the negatives outweigh the benefits for years. There are too many complications involving circ and some aren’t known for years (urinary opening scaring and painful erections due to lack of skin).
 
Parents - PLEASE research this issue. Don’t just trust your doctor’s advice - he probably makes a lot of money from performing them. Search online for complications of circumcision and complications from having a foreskin. See what seems worse to you. Watch an online video of circumcision, even religious ones to see what you think. There are various circumcision methods and several pain relief options, including using nothing at all as many doctors still do. Research, research, research!
I didn’t circumcise either of my children and I’ve never regretted the decision. My circumcised husband didn’t mind either and our kids have never noticed the difference. I’ve seen too many bothced circumcision and since there is no medical need for circ, we just left our kids as they were born. We figure if they ever want a circ for cosmetic reasons, they can have it done later. But if we had them circed as babies and something went wrong, we couldn’t put it back. So, whatever a parent may decide for their child, search all the options so you can make the best decision possible and know what to expect.
 
 


Add A Comment

A note about our commenting policy.


Comment
  1.  captcha arrow

Most Recent Culture Comments

{username}

I’ll agree that Gordy tolerated a lot of crap, but his patience wasn’t infinite—hence the banning of the nutcase übertea Wayne Johnson, exactly the kind of guy who gives libertarians the reputation for droolin’ batshittery they have. Gordy was also unwilling to pretend that gaybaiting was a…

Mark Laughlin avatar

Bobo was amazing; she threaded right through opponents in front of her like they weren’t there.  I think the bout could have easily gone the other way if she hadn’t been skating for the Dames. 

{username}

OHNO BOBO definitely made her mark with the Damgin’ Dames!!  Great bout Friday night at Savoy Rec Center!!! TCDG is doing a great job bringing Flat Track Derby to the area!  Keep up the good work and the crowds will come!

{username}

Mark, your first paragraph is mostly wrong. The second paragraph is true, though. Hulten has been a conflict of interest from Day One. The Champaign City Council made a big mistake in appointing him. The other two candidates were a lot better, a lot more intelligent, and far less biased.

{username}

I regularly commented at IP.com several moons ago, and I didn’t get the same impression of Gordy Hulten as the commenter above.  While there were times when his conservative bias incapacitated his reading comprehension skills, for the most part he was a patient and kind moderator who…

{username}

“Glock 21, an IlliniPundit regular has described the new incarnation of the site as “dead blog walking”.“ Glock21 is an example of “brain-dead man walking.“ “The site had its strengths and weaknesses ...“ Mostly weaknesses, though. The main strength was tipping us off there are many, many…

{username}

Glock 21, an IlliniPundit regular has described the new incarnation of the site as “dead blog walking”. The activity and updates have come to a stand still. The site had its strengths and weaknesses, but was a good barometer of what the landed gentry were thinking. They…

{username}

If you liked last week’s SameSexSunday—you’ll love this week’s! http://bit.ly/91zLi0

{username}

“ChampaignPundit” is a pretty broken site—effectively, you can’t sign up for an account, because there’s no way to specify or change a password. That means you either do the email “reset my password” thing to get a temporary password every time you want to make a comment,…

{username}

I think the nutballs knew that all their crazy theories would be accepted and embraced. That parade argument was a great example. Never mind that unsafe conditions created a hazard to participants and bystanders—IT WAS A TERRIBLE DECISION TO CANCEL IT!@!!!!!!! Or at least that’s what the…

Most Recent Comments

{username}

Illinois has simply had no luck at all in these Mizzou games. None. I think maybe we’re do for a couple of bounces to go our way. If we get one or two (or sever or eight) breaks, I think it’s a win. 

Dan Schreiber avatar

Jason, Savoy could easily join the CPL tax district, which is probably closer to most Savoy residents than the Tolono library is.  But my impression is that Savoy residents as a whole don’t want to pay the cost of the CPL (Tolono’s library taxes are cheaper), even…

{username}

Sorry, but I am lagging behind on updates to the map. Also, some construction projects were delayed from their original start date. On a more positive note, I am putting together a map of haunted houses in Central Illinois. I have a few plotted already, and I…

{username}

I’ve never gotten the privilege of all the services CPL cardholders get.  I just want to be able to go out of my way to drive to the CPL to check out books, pay fines, maybe buy some coffee, and enjoy the library.  None of those activities…

{username}

These days, there is more to using a library than checking out books. At one time, paying into the Lincoln Trails system probably would cover the expenses incurred by other libraries in the system. Now, with Internet, videos, coffee shops, wireless Internet hubs, etc., I suspect the…

{username}

(speaking as a Savoy resident)  By paying taxes to support a member of the LTLS, we are paying our “fair share” to use any LTLS library—Tolono, Champaign, Urbana, etc.  This is how library systems work.  The 6% of CPL’s circulation represented by Tolono users is NOT significant…

Rob McColley avatar

I read Timbo’s argument. I think the key word is “speculating.“

{username}

I would be interested to hear more about the “word on the street”—how are individual hauling companies fulfilling their promise to recycle?

{username}

Timbo makes a smart, sound argument. Reread it.

emma reaux avatar

I joined on 09-09-09 after living here over a year, and having to listen to my dad tell me how his best friend is, like, #27 or something crazy like that, and how said friend never lived further than 50 feet from the Illini Inn while going…

Dan Schreiber avatar

And, I might add, no one is being prevented from using the Champaign library. They are just being asked to pay their fair share if they are going to use it as their primary library.

Dan Schreiber avatar

The equation is pretty simple here. If you want social services, then pay the taxes required to run those social services. These things only work if everyone puts in their fair share. As a heavy user of the Champaign Library, I say bravo to this new policy.

Timbo avatar

Curtis Orchard is always good for an hour or three, especially if you have rugrats.

Timbo avatar

What is the increased marginal cost of serving a resident of Savoy or Mahomet? I suspect negligible. What is the increased revenue to be realized by this new policy? I suspect very little. Aside from these financial aspects, what are the most probable results from this new…

{username}

Looks like you are also all members of the killer sideburns club.

{username}

Thanks for the article, Ben.  I was not familiar with this band until now and even though I won’t be able to attend the show on Friday they are now on my radar.  A *good* jam band is hard to find, and these folks appear to fill…

{username}

Nice article, love the Dead quote in the beginning. If they can get down here to Central FL I’ll definitely be heading out to the show. Some of my friends have finally stopped wincing when I say “jam band.“ I’ve now tried my best at more descriptive…

Joel Gillespie avatar

@Annie: Yeah, my bad. That was the best part! Drinking + memory exercises = fun @Rob: According to Ask the English Teacher, “My dictionary says ‘drunk’ is an archaic past tense of ‘drink.‘“ We’re all about the new grammar around here.

Tracy Nectoux avatar

Katie, have the residents of Savoy and Tolono thought about having their taxes raised a little to help their public library expand? That’s a possibility for them. And then everybody wins.

Ben Valocchi avatar

good call on that Herring recording, Josh. Love that version of Exit Music….here’s a clip of the Cinco de Mayo show (from about six months prior). As I recall, this Shakedown went on for roughly a half hour, while getting into the Trampled Underfoot jam in the…

Log In



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?