My wrist has a heartbeat, too

Jon Stewart is faltering.
The First Voice of the American Realists must have smoked something that didn't agree with him, because he's vacillating toward pliability on The Defining Issue of Our Time. Last week, Stewart showed up completely unprepared, or possibly acquiescent for what he must have known was coming from the day Mike Huckabee's agent said "book it." Hucakabee spoke softly, carried a big stick, and a panoply factual misdirection. With these tools, he beat Stewart into fawning submission. In response, Jon could muster only "I'm pro-life."
Oh no he dit-int?
Oh yes, he did. And it's part of an increasingly distressing trend: Confronted with leadership, the liberal foundation cracks.
Last week Bill Maher urged us all to wake up to the laissez-faire reality of Disappointing Democrats. And sure, that was depressing. But you know, we expect nothing from Congress, right? They're all entrenched. The leadership has served since the Reagan years. They arrived on the Hill before cell phones, or the World Wide Web.
It's something else entirely to watch Jon Stewart fold in the face a mild-mannered Baptist cheeseburglar. If guys like Stewart wither, who'll stand up to God-in-Government freaks?
Huckabee struck early with a misdirection blow to the body of the pro-choice manifesto: "A human embryo has a heartbeat at 21 days," he said.
This proposition might seem to diminish the trimester formula so vital to the jurisprudence of a woman's right to her own body. Is Huckabee exaggerating? Of course he is.
Two tubes fuse together into an S-shape, and cardiac muscle contraction begins. You can call it a heartbeat if you want. Call it The Beginning of Life, if you prefer. Call it Ted for all I care.
Here's what Ted looks like:

A 21 Day Human Embryo — look like anyone you know?
My wrist has a heartbeat. My forearm is made up of nothing but human DNA and cells. Like a 21 day old embryo, the only thing preventing my wrist from attaining personhood is a massive suffusion of stem cells.
Other than that, my forearm is a person.
Huckabee's misdirection continued: "93% of abortions are elective abortions," he said, and added that "it has nothing to do with the health of the mother, it has nothing to do with the health of the baby" as if you should be outraged that most women get it abortions on time, before political extremists start breathing down their necks about whether it's viable, really necessary, or past the point where you should really have that choice anyhow.
This second barrage of touching irrelevancies winded Huckabee. So he had Jon run to the Green Room to grab him a couple of sandwiches and three Diet Cokes before continuing: "biologically and scientifically it's irrefutable" referring to the uniqueness of a (23 chromosome) + (23 chromosome) conflagration of human reproductive agents.
Again, it's true. Again, it's irrelevant. (But it makes one wonder how many millions of 23-chromosome-carrying cells Huckabee deposited in his own Kleenex by the time he was 16, and whether it still bothers him.)
On that note, I just farted a unique fart. I also just witnessed a sui generis melon-nibbling by our free-range hamster.
Unique happens all the time.
PERSON/NOT A PERSON
The question has never been whether a group of cells is unique. It's whether those cells constitute a person.
How can you tell? Just by looking? Well, even that can be deceiving.

A person

Not a person

Formerly a person, no longer a person

Hominidae Hominina Homo sapiens: a person

Marilynidae Mansonica Equus ferus caballus: not a person

Not a person. Still not a person. Still not a person. Nope. Never going to be a person.
For all of Huckabee's heartfelt misdirection, Stewart might have said something a bit less appeasing than "I hope that people begin to see that both sides can come at it with good faith and good intentions and are not frenzied and maniacal on one side and callous and indifferent on the other."
Oh goodie, we can all get along.
Anti-abortion wackos (frenzied, maniacal or just really fat) will never compromise. They cannot digest science in the face of emotion.
They complain about Roe v. Wade and its legal reasoning. They call it "poorly written." I've never understood that tactic, unless it's Rovian. Roe is an elegantly constructed piece of reading, whether approached as literature or jurisprudence. It even relies on Biblical reasoning — the only extra-Constitutional citation anti-abortionists seem to countenance — to come to its fairly simple conclusion: At some point, a person becomes a person and thus accrues individual rights.
I
ATTACK HUCKABEE
Mike Huckabee is really, really nice and friendly and also thinks the Constitution of the United States should be amended to accord with the Bible. It's that quiet, deadly combination of aplomb and dementia that makes charming dullards like Huckabee far, far more dangerous that easy targets like Sarah Palin or Randall Terry.
For a man as reason-neutral (and fat) as Huckabee to say the pro-choice person "hasn't thought through the logical implications" is an offense to lexicography. Huckabee represents a bastion of non-thought known euphemistically as "faith." Science and medicine are acknowledged by his flock, but not if they contradict the voices heard by homeless persons and desert wanderers of the first century (excepting those situations in which flock members use science and medicine in making personal decisions — rather than decisions they make for other people.)
Logic has nothing to do with it. If Mike Huckabee ever really "thought" rather than just "believed" he would likely have skipped his first career move (ordination, ministry) and gone straight into government. He also would never have gotten so fat.
But who needs logic anyway? A polemic needs no logic if one's interviewer merely nods, accepts all the propaganda at face value, and then quietly weeps in a corner.
Okay, now I'm exaggerating. If you saw the uncut interweb version; you know that Stewart merely pandered. He didn't actually lick Huckabee's cornhole, he merely browned his nose in it. The version that went out to the unspoiled millions made Stewart seem closer to Ed Meese than Ed Murrow.
Jon did not even challenge Huckabee's "health of the mother" bullshit. Huckabee can't even take care of himself much less presume to force an entire new life's path on a woman just because some dude was too drunk to pull out, or whatever. (Huckabee would naturally be non-empathetic to the concept of pulling out because persons of his girth are not able to support themselves in male superior position.)
TUA CULPA
Please Jon Stewart: recognize that you are our foremost ambassador to the world's mover/shakers. Tremble a bit about it if necessary. But stop with the "oh no, I'm not the newsperson, we are fake news" response.
You may believe yourself to be at "the squishy middle" of the abortion debate. But whether you wanted the mantle, you are the spokesman, even the leader of a generation of potentially reasoned people.
Don't screw this up.
12 comments
Duncan
How exactly does Huckabee’s weight relate to the abortion debate? I don’t see how juvenile insults make your case any stronger. And is Mike Huckabee really that overweight? From what I understand, it has lost a considerable amount of weight and now lives a healthier lifestyle (he runs marathons, etc.). Maybe I am missing something…. I don’t know.
Rob, did you watch the cut interview from the aired version, or did you watch the whole thing online?
Chris
O! M! G!
It is SUCH a RELIEF to know that in this hyper-P.C. age, in this ultra-progressive town, it is still acceptable to make fun of somebody’s weight.
As long as he’s pro-life.
Oh and, properly norished, your wrist will not grow into anything resembling your whole body. A child in utero, on the other hand—a little sustenance from the cord and what do you know!
And finally, since you feel the need to defend Roe, I’ll simply point out that the existence of Roe, a decision based on mutilated history and tortured statistics (tens of thousands of women dying from backalley abortions!), has in fact prevented a reasonable compromise on abortion law.
If the issue were ever to be decided legislatively, the result would be a compromise probably not much different than Europe—tighter restrictions on late-term abortions and generally permissive for any abortions before 20 weeks. As somebody who believes life deserves protection from conception, I wouldn’t like it, but then I wouldn’t have many allies left to fight for anything more restrictive.
So go on defending a disingenuous decision, based on lies, that has prevented the kind of democratic compromise that would be acceptable to most Americans.
Smart comments/dumb writer
That’s right, sorry…
Luke
<blockquote>Please Jon Stewart: recognize that you are our foremost ambassador to the world’s mover/shakers. Tremble a bit about it if necessary. But stop with the “oh no, I’m not the newsperson, we are fake news” response.</blockquote>
When pressed on this point, Jon Stewart will usually say something like “if that’s the case, it’s pretty sorry comentary on the job the real news media is doing.“ I have to hand that point to the guy.
John Hoeffleur
Rob, you’re a great American!
I don’t have a TV and I highly recommend that lifestyle choice to anyone. Like Jon Stewart, I contend that seeking anything more than laughs from a comedy program is folly.
I think your piece here brings a much needed sense of whimsy to the abortion debate - kind of like if I said, hypothetically, that it “really brings out the kid in me.“ Which of course I did not and would not say, thank you. Also, I like your fat jokes. Huckabee is totally fair game.
DISCLOSURE: If I have to team up with one camp or the other, I’m ferociously pro-choice. I favor broadening reproductive rights for all. Having said that…
I found your Roe v. Wade summation puzzling -“A person becomes a person and thus accrues individual rights.“ Perhaps you’re sarcastically suggesting that RvW is nonsense because it dodged the issue altogether (a person is already a person, right?). Prolly not what you meant, but if so, I agree!
In my view, Roe V. Wade is a poorly reasoned decision because it is not based on judicial principle but on the state of medical science at the time of the ruling. Due to the rapid advancement of medicine, the trimester scheme put forward in RvW continually becomes less applicable. Also, while RvW grants some reproductive rights to women, it grants absolutely none to men. For these reasons, it is a fundamentally flawed decision that is bound to be overturned eventually. DISCLOSURE: I did not attend law school.
BTW, your wrist has a pulse, not a heartbeat. DISCLOSURE: I am not Rob McColley’s doctor and I have not treated Rob McColley. Also, I did not attend medical school.
Just my two cents, this ain’t nothing but my opinin’. I sincerely like your style Rob, yr stuff is amusing and brainy. Props.
coda916
You need a couple more neener-neener non sequiturs…maybe a spinning butt plug or a pic of FSM would do the trick>
Smart comm...
Disclosure: that’s hilarious.
And what does “ferociously pro-choice” mean. Like, the gov. has the right to take part in every aspect of our bodies/minds, including new health care plans, the FDA, the EPA, CDC, not to mention stress-causing IRS - but don’t dare touch my abortions. My abortions are my own. I ain’t totally “pro-life,“ but that type of moral code/political alignment is fucked. Its Washington’s job to exploit for political gain as much as possible.
Michael K.
Whether pro choice or pro life; I’m not sure we should be letting the government have a say on this issue. Abortion is a choice that should be left to the respective family/mother.
This is not, and should not, be THE political issue of our generation. There are far more pressing issues at hand, but the only reason politicians have rallied around this issue is because voters have. Why, voters, has this become so important to you? Does a woman’s choice to have an abortion affect your life? I think this highlights the lack of education among voters to real political issues, issues that do affect them.
Smart comments...
But pro-lifers generally want legislation passed that would make abortion illegal…that’s why its political. I’m just sayin the ideals behind the politics are all backward. Kind of like the death penalty. Generally,the people that want the gov. out of their lives want them to step in and illegalize it, and vice versa. Its just another divide an conquer tactic by the corrupt major political parties of this country.
Open your eyes...
...this issue will be kept up for debate because politicians can wave this shiny, jingly set of keys in front of us while both sides of the aisle in DC agree compeletly on issues that, if put to the people in an understandishable context and format, none of us would agree to (like intervening in foreign affairs of sovereign countries). Keep it up, tards.
Mark
So these are your pro-choice arguments? That your wrist has a heart in it? That the uniqueness of every human being is no more important than the uniqueness of a fart? You gotta be kidding me. These are the worst pro-choice arguments ever.
Most Recent Opinion Comments
Change is the only constant thing in this world. Change is just an indication that a particular place is improving or not. It is a good thing that there is a room for a change but it must be a change for the better. It is just…
Now that Olympian is probably a given, they’re going to have to rename the section between Willow and 45. Any suggestions? Now lets get onto Urbana’s next road to nowhere. Airport Rd., They want to extend it from Bartlow west to Lincoln thru 3 farm fields. One…
I had a great time reading around your post as I read it extensively. Gold
I’ve always suspected that there’s a direct correlation between projected land use for the Rt 150 corridor [Industrial / Commercial] and the drive to expand 74. See the CCRPC Future Land Use Map for details, and then take a look at who owns land there, and you…
The University does not subsidize the Airbus. For decades bus transportation to the airport was provided expressly for Institute of Aviation students. This service was paid for by the Institute of Aviation, not campus as a whole. Some of you may even remember the old orange or…
A book just published gives a very useful different perspective on the “growth for growth’s sake” model and its ecological unsustainability. It is “Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet” by Tim Jackson. The first chapter of the book can be downloaded via http://earthscan.co.uk/pwg . This…
I agree with most of the comments on the Orange “Krush.“ They are mostly immature, ignorant, college students who can’t wait for the next frat party so they can get wasted on Keystone light
“Since there is no congestion on 74, one wonders what he is talking about.“ - Duh. Perhaps the congestion is wishful thinking? And IL DOT is planning to spend $71 million taxpayer dollars widening I-74 between Champaign and Mahomet. I contacted IL DOT on the I-74 stuff. …
Great articles, btw.
Most Popular Opinion Articles (60 days)
- Orange Krush simply an embarrassment
- Bad theology is like bad breath

- N-G redesign takes website from outdated to useless
- Lift the gavel on DUI
- Down with the R-word
- Forget it, Jake. It’s Champaign-Urbana

- About that gavel…
- A road in search of a reason
- Maybe Right’s not so wrong
- It’s time for the “Talk”
Most Recent Comments
Don’t have a lot of cash to buy a house? You should not worry, just because that is possible to receive the home loans to resolve such problems. So take a financial loan to buy everything you need.
I love eating Vietnamese food, and having growing up my entire life eating it, I was excited to go. I really wanted to like this place because of all of the hype I had heard——unfortunately, I was sorely disappointed. I got the pho (vietnamese soup) and thought…
People deserve wealthy life time and personal loans or just short term loan will make it better. Because people’s freedom is grounded on money state.
I guess that it does not matter if select dissertation writing services or thesis writing service! Because simply the quality of the thesis examples referring to this good post is is really important.
Kaiyo was decent for a sushi buffet, but it definitely isn’t as good as KO fusion. I thought it was better than any sushi I’ve ever had at a chinese buffet, but was not as good as my least favorite sushi item at KO fusion. However, I…
What is an antibiotic-free egg? And how can you tell?
Great article. I’ve always found that by making it in the blender, I can be my typical impatient self and pour tons of oil in at once. It’s very forgiving that way, though not fool proof.
I will be at Danu this evening. And seeing as tomorrow - St. Pat’s - is my birthday, I will be celebrating with tons of green and fun!
Big Blue will actually be on 6-9, despite what is posted elsewhere. Then, hightail it over to Bentley’s!
Yeeee! This sounds so fun! Any word on covers for any/all of these? Maybe SP could spring for punch cards and some discounts if we make it to all, eh?
Ok, just tell me when I can exhale - Just curious, since all the globalists, carbon traders, and pretty much anyone with copious amounts of wealth have weighed in on population reduction in recent years, i was wondering what yer magic number was. Some of the more…
ESPN360!!!!! For those that don’t know, you can watch the ESPNs’ games on your puter.
...and given the lack of smiley emoticons i chose to employ, that reads far more sarcastically than i ever intended (my apologies). i actually find this to be a great article and an interesting discussion, seriously : )
Once it leaves the basement, it is then called what? hmmm…....could it be mainstream? accessible? appealing on a mass-level? POP??? Quickly it will become a fad, over-saturate the media, and piss people off. Then everyone can write articles based on how that shit sucks, too. chickens are…
So John is seeing all comments as being authored by John. I am seeing all comments as authored by me. The first comment was Mysterious McDade who evidently acquired an Optimism Hat and is now seeing how it fits.
No, everyone is me! Muahahaha! I so didn’t make that first comment so I thought maybe someone was trying to get my goat, adding me to the staff. I hope jumping to that conclusion is forgivable. Yeah, uh, I guess I should say that I swear I…
Most Popular Articles (14 days)
- All’s well, no worries, next year will be great!
- Champaign Pop City

- If You’re Bored, Then You’re Boring
- Die another day
- A road in search of a reason
- A folk pop antidote to the drunken plague
- The Plastic Generation
- The Last Waltz roundtable
- Kaiyo a surprising delight for buffet
- “Nice flag, douchebag!“: one man’s quest to run as Lincoln
Recent Searches
- 1365 (2 Results)
- 1162 (6 Results)
- 1840 (1 Results)
- 1889 (1 Results)
- sheehan (8 Results)
- great lake (79 Results)
- 1889 (1 Results)
- champaign chocolate (37 Results)
- champaign chocolate (37 Results)
- justin martin (10 Results)
- 1687 (13 Results)
- neoga blacksmith (26 Results)
- 1687 (13 Results)
- 1840 (1 Results)
- 1880 (1 Results)
- stories beer (35 Results)
- 2020 (1 Results)
- 1840 (1 Results)
- 1933 (1 Results)
- 1901 (1 Results)

Facebook
Twitter
Full Site























Ok, just tell me when I can exhale - Just curious, since all the globalists, carbon traders, and pretty much anyone with copious amounts of wealth have weighed in on population reduction in recent years, i was wondering what yer magic number was. Some of the more…