iconLog In  |  Register

My wrist has a heartbeat, too

Jon Stewart is faltering.

The First Voice of the American Realists must have smoked something that didn't agree with him, because he's vacillating toward pliability on The Defining Issue of Our Time. Last week, Stewart showed up completely unprepared, or possibly acquiescent for what he must have known was coming from the day Mike Huckabee's agent said "book it." Hucakabee spoke softly, carried a big stick, and a panoply factual misdirection. With these tools, he beat Stewart into fawning submission. In response, Jon could muster only "I'm pro-life."

Oh no he dit-int?

Oh yes, he did. And it's part of an increasingly distressing trend: Confronted with leadership, the liberal foundation cracks.

Last week Bill Maher urged us all to wake up to the laissez-faire reality of Disappointing Democrats. And sure, that was depressing. But you know, we expect nothing from Congress, right? They're all entrenched. The leadership has served since the Reagan years. They arrived on the Hill before cell phones, or the World Wide Web.

It's something else entirely to watch Jon Stewart fold in the face a mild-mannered Baptist cheeseburglar. If guys like Stewart wither, who'll stand up to God-in-Government freaks?

Huckabee struck early with a misdirection blow to the body of the pro-choice manifesto: "A human embryo has a heartbeat at 21 days," he said.

This proposition might seem to diminish the trimester formula so vital to the jurisprudence of a woman's right to her own body. Is Huckabee exaggerating? Of course he is.

Two tubes fuse together into an S-shape, and cardiac muscle contraction begins. You can call it a heartbeat if you want. Call it The Beginning of Life, if you prefer. Call it Ted for all I care.

Here's what Ted looks like:


A 21 Day Human Embryo — look like anyone you know?

My wrist has a heartbeat. My forearm is made up of nothing but human DNA and cells. Like a 21 day old embryo, the only thing preventing my wrist from attaining personhood is a massive suffusion of stem cells.

Other than that, my forearm is a person.

Huckabee's misdirection continued: "93% of abortions are elective abortions," he said, and added that "it has nothing to do with the health of the mother, it has nothing to do with the health of the baby" as if you should be outraged that most women get it abortions on time, before political extremists start breathing down their necks about whether it's viable, really necessary, or past the point where you should really have that choice anyhow.

This second barrage of touching irrelevancies winded Huckabee. So he had Jon run to the Green Room to grab him a couple of sandwiches and three Diet Cokes before continuing: "biologically and scientifically it's irrefutable" referring to the uniqueness of a (23 chromosome) + (23 chromosome) conflagration of human reproductive agents.

Again, it's true. Again, it's irrelevant. (But it makes one wonder how many millions of 23-chromosome-carrying cells Huckabee deposited in his own Kleenex by the time he was 16, and whether it still bothers him.)

On that note, I just farted a unique fart. I also just witnessed a sui generis melon-nibbling by our free-range hamster.

Unique happens all the time.

PERSON/NOT A PERSON

The question has never been whether a group of cells is unique. It's whether those cells constitute a person.

How can you tell? Just by looking? Well, even that can be deceiving.


A person


Not a person


Formerly a person, no longer a person

Hominidae Hominina Homo sapiens: a person

Marilynidae Mansonica Equus ferus caballus: not a person



Not a person. Still not a person. Still not a person. Nope. Never going to be a person.

For all of Huckabee's heartfelt misdirection, Stewart might have said something a bit less appeasing than "I hope that people begin to see that both sides can come at it with good faith and good intentions and are not frenzied and maniacal on one side and callous and indifferent on the other."

Oh goodie, we can all get along.

Anti-abortion wackos (frenzied, maniacal or just really fat) will never compromise. They cannot digest science in the face of emotion.

They complain about Roe v. Wade and its legal reasoning. They call it "poorly written." I've never understood that tactic, unless it's Rovian. Roe is an elegantly constructed piece of reading, whether approached as literature or jurisprudence. It even relies on Biblical reasoning — the only extra-Constitutional citation anti-abortionists seem to countenance — to come to its fairly simple conclusion: At some point, a person becomes a person and thus accrues individual rights.


I  ATTACK HUCKABEE

Mike Huckabee is really, really nice and friendly and also thinks the Constitution of the United States should be amended to accord with the Bible. It's that quiet, deadly combination of aplomb and dementia that makes charming dullards like Huckabee far, far more dangerous that easy targets like Sarah Palin or Randall Terry.

For a man as reason-neutral (and fat) as Huckabee to say the pro-choice person "hasn't thought through the logical implications" is an offense to lexicography. Huckabee represents a bastion of non-thought known euphemistically as "faith." Science and medicine are acknowledged by his flock, but not if they contradict the voices heard by homeless persons and desert wanderers of the first century (excepting those situations in which flock members use science and medicine in making personal decisions — rather than decisions they make for other people.)

Logic has nothing to do with it. If Mike Huckabee ever really "thought" rather than just "believed" he would likely have skipped his first career move (ordination, ministry) and gone straight into government. He also would never have gotten so fat.

But who needs logic anyway? A polemic needs no logic if one's interviewer merely nods, accepts all the propaganda at face value, and then quietly weeps in a corner.

Okay, now I'm exaggerating. If you saw the uncut interweb version; you know that Stewart merely pandered. He didn't actually lick Huckabee's cornhole, he merely browned his nose in it. The version that went out to the unspoiled millions made Stewart seem closer to Ed Meese than Ed Murrow.

Jon did not even challenge Huckabee's "health of the mother" bullshit. Huckabee can't even take care of himself much less presume to force an entire new life's path on a woman just because some dude was too drunk to pull out, or whatever. (Huckabee would naturally be non-empathetic to the concept of pulling out because persons of his girth are not able to support themselves in male superior position.)

TUA CULPA

Please Jon Stewart: recognize that you are our foremost ambassador to the world's mover/shakers. Tremble a bit about it if necessary. But stop with the "oh no, I'm not the newsperson, we are fake news" response.

You may believe yourself to be at "the squishy middle" of the abortion debate. But whether you wanted the mantle, you are the spokesman, even the leader of a generation of potentially reasoned people.

Don't screw this up.

12 comments

username

Duncan

#1

How exactly does Huckabee’s weight relate to the abortion debate? I don’t see how juvenile insults make your case any stronger.  And is Mike Huckabee really that overweight?  From what I understand, it has lost a considerable amount of weight and now lives a healthier lifestyle (he runs marathons, etc.).  Maybe I am missing something…. I don’t know.
 
 
 
 

username

Mike Ingram

#2

Rob, did you watch the cut interview from the aired version, or did you watch the whole thing online?

username

Chris

#3

O! M! G!
It is SUCH a RELIEF to know that in this hyper-P.C. age, in this ultra-progressive town, it is still acceptable to make fun of somebody’s weight.
As long as he’s pro-life.
Oh and, properly norished, your wrist will not grow into anything resembling your whole body.  A child in utero, on the other hand—a little sustenance from the cord and what do you know!
And finally, since you feel the need to defend Roe, I’ll simply point out that the existence of Roe, a decision based on mutilated history and tortured statistics (tens of thousands of women dying from backalley abortions!), has in fact prevented a reasonable compromise on abortion law.
If the issue were ever to be decided legislatively, the result would be a compromise probably not much different than Europe—tighter restrictions on late-term abortions and generally permissive for any abortions before 20 weeks. As somebody who believes life deserves protection from conception, I wouldn’t like it, but then I wouldn’t have many allies left to fight for anything more restrictive.
So go on defending a disingenuous decision, based on lies, that has prevented the kind of democratic compromise that would be acceptable to most Americans.

username

Smart comments/dumb writer

#4

That’s right, sorry…

username

Luke

#5

<blockquote>Please Jon Stewart: recognize that you are our foremost ambassador to the world’s mover/shakers. Tremble a bit about it if necessary. But stop with the “oh no, I’m not the newsperson, we are fake news” response.</blockquote>
 
When pressed on this point, Jon Stewart will usually say something like “if that’s the case, it’s pretty sorry comentary on the job the real news media is doing.“  I have to hand that point to the guy.
 

username

John Hoeffleur

#6

Rob, you’re a great American!

I don’t have a TV and I highly recommend that lifestyle choice to anyone. Like Jon Stewart, I contend that seeking anything more than laughs from a comedy program is folly.

I think your piece here brings a much needed sense of whimsy to the abortion debate - kind of like if I said, hypothetically, that it “really brings out the kid in me.“ Which of course I did not and would not say, thank you. Also, I like your fat jokes. Huckabee is totally fair game.

DISCLOSURE: If I have to team up with one camp or the other, I’m ferociously pro-choice.  I favor broadening reproductive rights for all.  Having said that…

I found your Roe v. Wade summation puzzling -“A person becomes a person and thus accrues individual rights.“  Perhaps you’re sarcastically suggesting that RvW is nonsense because it dodged the issue altogether (a person is already a person, right?). Prolly not what you meant, but if so, I agree!

In my view, Roe V. Wade is a poorly reasoned decision because it is not based on judicial principle but on the state of medical science at the time of the ruling. Due to the rapid advancement of medicine, the trimester scheme put forward in RvW continually becomes less applicable.  Also, while RvW grants some reproductive rights to women, it grants absolutely none to men. For these reasons, it is a fundamentally flawed decision that is bound to be overturned eventually. DISCLOSURE: I did not attend law school.

BTW, your wrist has a pulse, not a heartbeat.  DISCLOSURE: I am not Rob McColley’s doctor and I have not treated Rob McColley.  Also, I did not attend medical school.

Just my two cents, this ain’t nothing but my opinin’.  I sincerely like your style Rob, yr stuff is amusing and brainy.  Props.

username

coda916

#7

You need a couple more neener-neener non sequiturs…maybe a spinning butt plug or a pic of FSM would do the trick>

username

Smart comm...

#8

Disclosure: that’s hilarious.
And what does “ferociously pro-choice” mean. Like, the gov. has the right to take part in every aspect of our bodies/minds, including new health care plans, the FDA, the EPA, CDC, not to mention stress-causing IRS - but don’t dare touch my abortions. My abortions are my own. I ain’t totally “pro-life,“ but that type of moral code/political alignment is fucked. Its Washington’s job to exploit for political gain as much as possible.

username

Michael K.

#9

Whether pro choice or pro life; I’m not sure we should be letting the government have a say on this issue.  Abortion is a choice that should be left to the respective family/mother.  
This is not, and should not, be THE political issue of our generation.  There are far more pressing issues at hand, but the only reason politicians have rallied around this issue is because voters have.  Why, voters, has this become so important to you?  Does a woman’s choice to have an abortion affect your life?  I think this highlights the lack of education among voters to real political issues, issues that do affect them.  

username

Smart comments...

#10

But pro-lifers generally want legislation passed that would make abortion illegal…that’s why its political. I’m just sayin the ideals behind the politics are all backward. Kind of like the death penalty. Generally,the people that want the gov. out of their lives want them to step in and illegalize it, and vice versa. Its just another divide an conquer tactic by the corrupt major political parties of this country.

username

Open your eyes...

#11

...this issue will be kept up for debate because politicians can wave this shiny, jingly set of keys in front of us while both sides of the aisle in DC agree compeletly on issues that, if put to the people in an understandishable context and format, none of us would agree to (like intervening in foreign affairs of sovereign countries). Keep it up, tards.

username

Mark

#12

So these are your pro-choice arguments? That your wrist has a heart in it? That the uniqueness of every human being is no more important than the uniqueness of a fart? You gotta be kidding me. These are the worst pro-choice arguments ever.


Add A Comment

Comment
  1.  captcha arrow

Most Recent Opinion Comments

{username}

Who played?

Glock21 avatar

Almost every issue this amendment attempts to address is merely a symptom of a much bigger, and unsurprisingly, much more difficult to solve problem: Voter apathy.   You want to force term limits because voters generally don’t care enough to throw out bums who come off as…

{username}

First the Detroit Freep links. Keep term limits: http://www.freep.com/article/20100204/OPINION05/2040400/1068/OPINION/Keep-limits-Longer-time-in-office-wont-fix-state Repeal term limits: http://www.freep.com/article/20100204/OPINION05/2040403/1068/OPINION/Repeal-limits-Experience-is-not-an-evil-thing Second. I don’t have a real strong opinion on term limits, but generally think they do more harm than good.  However, I have no proof of that.  But, my experience, from working in government…

Tony Pomonis avatar

Thanks for the input everyone. Stuart, I could use some help. Your entire comment seems supportive except for the last, declarative sentence.  You ask very cogent, thought-provoking questions which are appreciated and further the discussion.  I myself don’t know how things will shake out once it is…

{username}

1) Gerrymandering - I do two things. Allowing everyone to participate at least keeps the insiders from having sole control. And two, allowing anyone to go to court makes it enforceable.  2) 7-day viewing - With all legislation of import being done in a back room with…

{username}

Ending Gerrymandering seems like a good idea, if some sort of unbiased program could be constructed.  Even then, what would the criteria be for grouping people?  I suspect the process would still be gamed, and underrepresented groups would object to the possibility or even likelihood of losing…

{username}

Awesome article, Tony. No one likes how things are going in this state, and they need to do something about it! Here is their chance! I’ll be printing out some petitions and collecting signatures myself.

Timbo avatar

I’m not so sure that the drafters of the proposed amendment were all that careful in putting something together that would withstand all legal challenges. Amendments to the IL Const. must only deal with “structural and procedural subjects contained in Article IV”  of the IL Const (which…

{username}

Hi vicki, thanks so much for reading. i was really hoping you would, and looking forward to hearing your thoughts. I truly value your opinion. First let me say that I do sypmathize with any minority in this or any other country. I’m not judging Muslim women…

{username}

(Ed. note — this comment was sent in to us, and we decided to post it. It’s an informative comment, and one that we all agree adds to the debate well. — SBF) I wish you guys didn’t shut down comments on Seth Fein’s new article, “Lift…

Most Recent Comments

{username}

It’s been a while since we’ve seen you.  I wanted to let you know that our “Hunters’ Feast” will be starting February 19th.  In addition to our full dinner menu, we will offer wild boar schnitzel, roasted rabbit legs, vennison tenderloin & a variety of wild game…

Annie Weisner avatar

Well, reader, I’m not quite sure what to say.  Sounds like you and Elsinore have some issues to work out amongst yourselves.  I’m just going to sit back and let that happen.

{username}

Its cool Annie, I know deep down you don’t give a shit, but yer being gracious. Check out the new Clipd Beaks, or Brian Jonestown Massacre, or Black Ryder from Australia. Yer right though, Chemicals is one song that acually says nothing. Usually, music that doesn’t really…

{username}

Who played?

{username}

I triuly enjoy being employed at the new Fat City!!!

Seth Fein avatar

I made these this weekend, albeit without the Pickling Spice. They are fucking tremendous. Wish I had local cukes, but alas they looked good and crispy at the store the other day.   Here is more: they were ready within 12 hours. Now, I suspect they will…

{username}

No Iowa coverage?

{username}

For anyone interested in this stuff, there is aniInteresting show on tonight, Mon, Feb 8, on WILL TV, Blueprint America. about infrastructure, comparing Spanish gains in rail to American decline, with Detroit as, as usual, the basket case. 

{username}

To the poster above - Your a Dead Soul. (giggle, giggle) No, really, think about it.

Feldman avatar

Jared played this on WEFT Sessions in September 2008, and in a year mistechtrophic songs I think this was my favorite of the year—this simple version of  “I_Refute_Technology.mp3“ with acoustic guitar, electric bass, and two voices, it’s a good song.  Musician, cover thyself!

{username}

Great job Suzanne.  I really like how you sum up how George is a man stuck in his past and unwilling to explore his future.  Thanks for your concise, thoughtful writing.

{username}

I’m proud to see you young girls getting out there!  Wow - that takes motivation and courage.  Glad to see you’re getting some press too. 

{username}

Like Jason, I’ve been told by people who would know that HoG and Tang Dynasty are the most authentic Chinese food restaurants in town. One woman described HoG as “home cooking.“  Its tofu Pad Thai is perfection.   Jason is also spot on that Mandarin Wok is…

Glock21 avatar

Almost every issue this amendment attempts to address is merely a symptom of a much bigger, and unsurprisingly, much more difficult to solve problem: Voter apathy.   You want to force term limits because voters generally don’t care enough to throw out bums who come off as…

{username}

After seeing the documentary “Food Inc.“ I may never eat meat that’s not local again, and am seriously considering the vegan option.  Check it out.

Jason Z. avatar

I wouldn’t be too quick to discount this place simply based on its location or plastic eating utensils.  I’ve been told that this place is one of the more authentic Chinese restaurants in town by a couple of different people who would know.  That’s not to say…

mattstan avatar

It’s mediocre—not bad, but pretty much standard campus fare.  “Plastic fork cuisine” is pretty apt.  I have no experience searching for food from a vegan perspective, but for omnivores (or even vegetarians), I’d say there are at least five better Chinese and Thai places around town, maybe more.

{username}

First the Detroit Freep links. Keep term limits: http://www.freep.com/article/20100204/OPINION05/2040400/1068/OPINION/Keep-limits-Longer-time-in-office-wont-fix-state Repeal term limits: http://www.freep.com/article/20100204/OPINION05/2040403/1068/OPINION/Repeal-limits-Experience-is-not-an-evil-thing Second. I don’t have a real strong opinion on term limits, but generally think they do more harm than good.  However, I have no proof of that.  But, my experience, from working in government…

Rob McColley avatar

When I was an undergrad, I too occasionally had enough money for a cheap greasy spoon (chopstick) meal.   On those occasions, I felt mildly celebratory about not boiling or microwaving my own dinner.   It looks like this meal came in Styrofoam, with a plastic fork.   There are…

{username}

As a relatively recent convert, I very much look forward to dining at this restaurant, and to the rest of your series! An excellent, marvelous idea…thank you!

Log In



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

KeResS