Trickle Down Charity
It looks like trickle-down economics has only seven more weeks of life left before Barack Obama is sworn in and shuts the party down. No more tax cuts for the wealthy so they can create jobs for the rest of us. No more relying on the self-interest of the powerful to accidentally and occasionally intersect with the welfare of others. We’ll be on our own, without the elites to look after us.
If this concerns you, take heart, for the Christmas season is upon us. After all, Christmas is about hope and faith, so what better time to validate your devotion to a theory that has been so thoroughly debunked? And Christmas is about giving too, so this may be your last opportunity for the next four years to show your faith in a bankrupt economic policy by combining it with year-end charity.
How so? Well, if you truly believe that tax cuts for the wealthy are the best we can collectively do for ourselves, the course is clear: Don’t give money to charities, which will just waste your money by distributing it to poor people in need. Instead, give your charity dollars to people who are already wealthy, who will in turn make life better for everyone else. After all, if the wealthy had even more money, they may end up hiring more people, many of whom live in this country, and some of those for wages that are higher than the minimum allowable by law.
Locally, I would suggest going through Krannert Center program inserts to identify all the people who gave more than $1,000, or copy down the names of people etched on the donor wall at the library. Look their names up in the phone book, and just send checks to them — whatever amount you would have wasted giving to local food shelters or homeless shelters.
If you have old winter coats or mittens, don’t drop them off at Goodwill, as they would just make their way to needy children. Instead, drive around the wealthier neighborhoods of southwest Champaign, look for the biggest houses, and drop off your spare clothes there. They might have maids or gardeners they could afford to hire if they could pay them with used clothes.
Or, if you are uncomfortable giving money to individuals, there are plenty of businesses here in town that are probably still making a profit, even during this economic downturn. Find out which companies are doing the best, and then send them money. If trickle down really works, I’m sure they would be more than willing to share their profit with competitors that aren’t doing as well. People and institutions always do the right thing when they are flush with cash.
As for me, I guess I’m just not smart enough to figure out how this works. I will stubbornly continue to support organizations that are mandated to serve others, rather than maximize profit. I used to feel out of step about this. But come January 20th, I think I’ll finally feel good about it again.
2 comments
ad
There is a boys and girls club in California that has spent $20,000 on a new solar generator and has a $250,000 projected savings.
When looking for ways to help, perhaps earmarking funds for such a project makes more sense that just handing out food or shelter for the moment.
Roger nehring
ad, When people are hungry and homeless, and we, collectively, refuse to provide adequate care(as in public funding), then we, individually are obliged as caring humans to give what we can to sustain them. The Big Brother Big Sister project sounds very worthwhile and I laud anyone who supports it. But to minimize support of immediate critical needs as,“just handing out food for the moment.” seems heartles to me. Are you suggesting that the wealthiest nation in the history of the world can’t support both types of good and necessary work?
Most Recent Opinion Comments
hey, if hair ain’t gon’ be over your head, my jokes may as well be.
Okay, almost 24 hours later and I finally got Issac’s Summer joke. I’m an idiot.
Swap the dog for a fire pit and it sounds like you’re writing about my back yard. Very nice.
funny, as your summer begins, another Summer ends.
And that, my friend, is love. Bob, I think I still owe you for my wedding cake, served in 1998. But nevermind.
I believe the kiss between Rob and I was documented on low-quality videotape in the mid-ninties porn classic, Dirty Harry…and Sticky.
“Do I have to sign some forms, or am I just considered ‘in.’” You’re in!
Got damn, Coulter. You are the greatest.
I have no specific memory of it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if I’d kissed Mike, too—once we’d both drunk ourselves gay. And earlier this week I gave Clarence Shelley a back rub. Do I have to sign some forms, or am I just considered “in.”
Most Popular Opinion Articles (60 days)
- Feeling Hot, Hot, Hot!
- “Opposite” marriage includes fun, love, and drinking in the day
- I bet you wish you had a hat
- Politics and poker may or may not mix
- Priest suing N-G is part of Catholic splinter group
- Opening day brings drinks to the table
- Off the rails
- The desert
- A Modest-ish Proposal
- Double trouble in Coulter’s dog prison
Most Recent Comments
As a liberal conservative, and a person who favors taxes & services ... and also a sense of proportion; I savor the comic potential that still exists in this comments section. I’m pretty sure we can goad more anti-government rhetoric from confirmed progressives and government employees. If…
Did the Crave Truck get a permit to park in city metered spots and city right of way? Or did they just get a permit? The city clerk’s office seems to be a suspect here, but it’s not clear they did anything wrong. Did the Crave Truck…
High-profile whining. AKA Lobbying.
it’s quite choice. looking forward to seeing how it and its patronage grow and develop over the course of the year. could be a neat little ecosystem.
“It was at this point, before he started his business, that working with city employees should’ve raised red flags…” But they didn’t because: 1) The City Clerk’s office originally mis-interpreted the rules, or are indeed re-interpreting them. 2) Champaign’s brick-n-mortar merchants hadn’t yet started whining about The Crave Truck.
Super cool! Excellent track, Excellent band.
Looking forward to trying this place!
I’m in the middle (or the beginning or end, depending on how you look at it) of re-reading Slaughterhouse Five. What a great companion column.
Get yours early. The Rave’s CD will be available at Exile and at The C-U Flea on Saturday. C-U Flea details here: http://www.smilepolitely.com/news/sp_radio_podcast_c-u_flea_arrives/
I don’t know about Gerard and a random police sargeant. My (mild) outrage is based on this: “...he worked closely with Champaign City Clerk Marilyn Banks to make sure he was licensed properly as a transient food peddler, filling out the necessary paperwork and paying a $225…
Local Yocal pretty much nails it here. I suspect there will be merchants who oppose food trucks because they arguably don’t pay their fair share to locate their trucks in high traffic (high rent) areas. The food trucks take away business from rent payers, park in city…
Oh nice! I’d totally vote for Matt Campbell!
“Smile Politely sports writer announces candidacy for city government.”
I also got to visit Big Grove Tavern during the soft open and definitely enjoyed the pork belly the most of all the dishes I sampled. The cheesy grits and the vinegary pickled vegetables were a perfect compliment to the rich pork belly.
The Alan Partridge lookalike on the right in the first small photo has nothing to condescend to anyone about. AH HA!
Snell and the little Hitlers of the neighborhood association need to chill out. Legitimate businesses should have the freedom to exist without having to endure the slings and arrows of ignorant and misguided opposition.
represent, Matt.
Yeah, I’d agree that Transporter Room 3 is the worst house venue I’ve ever seen.
Food trucks are the start-up, small businesses of the future for those unable to afford real estate. No surprise, that merchants who pay rent, utilities, and maintenance on a property would despise the traveling competition. Or developers who build more empty retail spaces would want to close…
Not so much far-right Tea Party as a balanced, moderate viewpoint between letting businesses succeed and protecting society with reasonable regulations. In spite of what the city reps are saying, the interpretation of policy on this issue certainly has changed. Letting a business start up under one…
Facebook
Twitter
Full Site
I’m in the middle (or the beginning or end, depending on how you look at it) of re-reading Slaughterhouse Five. What a great companion column.