Why gays are morally superior to Christians : Opinion : Smile Politely

Why gays are morally superior to Christians

Posted in OPINION to The Loyal Opposition by Dan Schreiber on Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 11:59 am

Controversy over "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is starting to heat up again, as President Obama continues to drag his feet in the face of continued firings of military personnel who admit to being gay.

The 1993 policy was one of those compromises that made everyone angrier than they already were. Bill Clinton had campaigned to allow homosexuals to openly serve in the military, but waffled on actually implementing it. "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" continued the ban on openly serving, but no longer required recruits to sign statements indicating their sexual orientation.

The ruling made gay-rights folks angry, because it sent them right back to the closet and continued the criminalization of homosexuality in the military. The ruling made anti-gay folks angry because they are angry at anything less than total discrimination against gayness.

In honor of culture wars nostalgia, I'd like to resurrect a 1993 entry into the fray from Stanley Hauerwas, a Duke Divinity School theologian. He wrote a short essay titled "Why Gays (as a Group) are Morally Superior to Christians (as a Group)."

"Pacifist," "cantankerous," and "funny" are three words not normally anywhere near each other when describing a theologian. However, Hauerwas seems to put them all together into one entertaining package. He once jokingly asked, "Why say carefully what you can say offensively?" Given how often he pisses people off, one wonders how much of a joke it really is.

For example, in this case he uses an incendiary essay title to join an angry debate as a way to lecture Christians about pacifism.

His reasoning is as follows:

The military views gays as bad for morale, as "doubtful warriors," and as "suspect for military service."
The military does not view Christians this way.
Ergo, gays as a group are more moral than Christians as a group.

However, he is hopeful that Christians might someday become unfit for military service, if they work faithfully enough at it. His suggestions are:

Apply Just War Theory to their job. This would include things like
1. question targeting strategies of nuclear weapons
2. refuse to bomb in cities where civilians may be killed
3. insist not on killing but on incapacitating the enemy by taking prisoners or wounding them.
4. question the idea of a standing army
Openly pray for enemies.
Encourage the belief that it is more important to die than to kill unjustly.
Question the sexual license that is so prevalent in military culture.
Make it plain to everyone that a Christian's first loyalty is to God, and only secondarily to their military commanders.
Make other soldiers concerned about taking showers with them, as a baptism risk.

In the end, Hauerwas completely sidesteps the issue of homosexuality itself. He mainly wants to point out that if Christians lived faithfully according to Jesus' message of nonviolence, they would be a far bigger threat to military morale and efficiency than those attracted to the same gender.

Yes, it is depressing that President Obama's spine is now twisting on a number of things, including his campaign promise to decriminalize homosexuality. However, the gay community can take heart in at least one thing: It is unlikely that Christians as a group will become as moral as they are anytime soon.

2 comments

Susan Potter

05/26/09 at 05:16

Just to let people know that there will be a marriage equality rally in downtown Champaign tomorrow (Tuesday 5/26) at 5:30pm by the Susan B Anthony monument at the Main and Neil intersection.
Please bring your cameras, camcorders, signs/banners and most importantly yourselves:)
Check out:
CU Day of Decision Website
CU Day of Decision Press Release
RSVP on the Facebook Event Page
See you there.
Susan

Luke

05/27/09 at 05:36

Susan Potter,
I came to accept Gay Marriage as an issue from a Libertarian perspective: If the government can regulate a person’s most intimate and personal relationship, then what can’t they regulate? I’ve found this perspective to be under-represented in the media coverage. For those of us who are straight and who grew up in a mostly-conservative community, presenting the as a freedom issue (rather than a gay issue) may resonate best.

The other thing that changed my perspective was meeting some real-life gay people. In addition to a sibling who came out of the closet, I found out that a colleague whose work I respect is gay. After those two revelations, my childish prejeduces just naturally fell away!

Dan Schreiber,
I really like the logic in the article, and I pretty much agree with it. But it only resonates with me since I got to see the ugly side of Christianity up close and personal, after my sibling came out of the closet… Ignoring the spiritual aspects, I bet that people who are actively participating in Christianity are likely to think of Christianity as the friendly (to them) community that their church provides—so the contradictions pointed out in the article probably don’t matter to them. That’s fine… But since I’m not part of a church community, I can’t end my comments without saying empatically that I personally value my actual family much more than I value a church, a religion, or somebody else’s idea of “family values”—so there’s no way that I could possibly consider participating in any church that wouldn’t genuinely welcome my entire extended family as it is.

Add A Comment

Most Recent Opinion Comments

Who played?

Posted by Petey to the entry 'More Super Bowl life lessons on 02/09/10.

Almost every issue this amendment attempts to address is merely a symptom of a much bigger, and unsurprisingly, much more difficult to solve problem: Voter apathy. You want to force term limits because voters generally don’t care enough to throw out bums who come off as…

Posted by Glock21 to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/06/10.

First the Detroit Freep links. Keep term limits: http://www.freep.com/article/20100204/OPINION05/2040400/1068/OPINION/Keep-limits-Longer-time-in-office-wont-fix-state Repeal term limits: http://www.freep.com/article/20100204/OPINION05/2040403/1068/OPINION/Repeal-limits-Experience-is-not-an-evil-thing Second. I don’t have a real strong opinion on term limits, but generally think they do more harm than good. However, I have no proof of that. But, my experience, from working in government…

Posted by Stuart Tarr to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/05/10.

Thanks for the input everyone. Stuart, I could use some help. Your entire comment seems supportive except for the last, declarative sentence. You ask very cogent, thought-provoking questions which are appreciated and further the discussion. I myself don’t know how things will shake out once it is…

Posted by Tony Pomonis to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/04/10.

1) Gerrymandering - I do two things. Allowing everyone to participate at least keeps the insiders from having sole control. And two, allowing anyone to go to court makes it enforceable. 2) 7-day viewing - With all legislation of import being done in a back room with…

Posted by John Bambenek to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/04/10.

Ending Gerrymandering seems like a good idea, if some sort of unbiased program could be constructed. Even then, what would the criteria be for grouping people? I suspect the process would still be gamed, and underrepresented groups would object to the possibility or even likelihood of losing…

Posted by Stuart Tarr to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/04/10.

Awesome article, Tony. No one likes how things are going in this state, and they need to do something about it! Here is their chance! I’ll be printing out some petitions and collecting signatures myself.

Posted by Andrea to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/04/10.

I’m not so sure that the drafters of the proposed amendment were all that careful in putting something together that would withstand all legal challenges. Amendments to the IL Const. must only deal with “structural and procedural subjects contained in Article IV” of the IL Const (which…

Posted by Timbo to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/03/10.

Hi vicki, thanks so much for reading. i was really hoping you would, and looking forward to hearing your thoughts. I truly value your opinion. First let me say that I do sypmathize with any minority in this or any other country. I’m not judging Muslim women…

Posted by Cheryl to the entry 'Maybe Right's not so wrong on 02/01/10.

(Ed. note — this comment was sent in to us, and we decided to post it. It’s an informative comment, and one that we all agree adds to the debate well. — SBF) I wish you guys didn’t shut down comments on Seth Fein’s new article, “Lift…

Posted by Tim Johnston to the entry 'Lift the gavel on DUI on 02/01/10.

Opinion Archives

2010

2009

2008

2007

Most Recent Comments

Its cool Annie, I know deep down you don’t give a shit, but yer being gracious. Check out the new Clipd Beaks, or Brian Jonestown Massacre, or Black Ryder from Australia. Yer right though, Chemicals is one song that acually says nothing. Usually, music that doesn’t really…

By Amandaman to the entry 'Album review: Elsinore's The Chemicals on 02/09/10.

Who played?

By Petey to the entry 'More Super Bowl life lessons on 02/09/10.

I triuly enjoy being employed at the new Fat City!!!

By marcus powell to the entry 'A New Lease for Fat City Bar and Grill on 02/08/10.

I made these this weekend, albeit without the Pickling Spice. They are fucking tremendous. Wish I had local cukes, but alas they looked good and crispy at the store the other day. Here is more: they were ready within 12 hours. Now, I suspect they will…

By Seth Fein to the entry 'The quest for crunchy dill pickles on 02/08/10.

No Iowa coverage?

By zach to the entry 'Illini take Sparty; Dmac claims: "I'll be back" on 02/08/10.

For anyone interested in this stuff, there is aniInteresting show on tonight, Mon, Feb 8, on WILL TV, Blueprint America. about infrastructure, comparing Spanish gains in rail to American decline, with Detroit as, as usual, the basket case.

By stuart Tarr to the entry 'Homage to Catalunya on 02/08/10.

To the poster above - Your a Dead Soul. (giggle, giggle) No, really, think about it.

By Sick to the entry 'Discovering local independent media on 02/07/10.

Jared played this on WEFT Sessions in September 2008, and in a year mistechtrophic songs I think this was my favorite of the year—this simple version of “I_Refute_Technology.mp3“ with acoustic guitar, electric bass, and two voices, it’s a good song. Musician, cover thyself!

By Feldman to the entry 'Album Review: I Refute Technology by Jared Bartman on 02/07/10.

Great job Suzanne. I really like how you sum up how George is a man stuck in his past and unwilling to explore his future. Thanks for your concise, thoughtful writing.

By Chuckster to the entry 'A Single Man-A Singular Triumph on 02/07/10.

I’m proud to see you young girls getting out there! Wow - that takes motivation and courage. Glad to see you’re getting some press too.

By Sheridan to the entry 'Roller derby in C-U?! on 02/07/10.

Like Jason, I’ve been told by people who would know that HoG and Tang Dynasty are the most authentic Chinese food restaurants in town. One woman described HoG as “home cooking.“ Its tofu Pad Thai is perfection. Jason is also spot on that Mandarin Wok is…

By Tracy to the entry 'Confounding name, delicious food on 02/07/10.

By Glock21 to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/06/10.

After seeing the documentary “Food Inc.“ I may never eat meat that’s not local again, and am seriously considering the vegan option. Check it out.

By Andrea Antulov to the entry 'Confounding name, delicious food on 02/05/10.

I wouldn’t be too quick to discount this place simply based on its location or plastic eating utensils. I’ve been told that this place is one of the more authentic Chinese restaurants in town by a couple of different people who would know. That’s not to say…

By Jason Z. to the entry 'Confounding name, delicious food on 02/05/10.

It’s mediocre—not bad, but pretty much standard campus fare. “Plastic fork cuisine” is pretty apt. I have no experience searching for food from a vegan perspective, but for omnivores (or even vegetarians), I’d say there are at least five better Chinese and Thai places around town, maybe more.

By mattstan to the entry 'Confounding name, delicious food on 02/05/10.

By Stuart Tarr to the entry 'Putting on the Putback Amendment on 02/05/10.

When I was an undergrad, I too occasionally had enough money for a cheap greasy spoon (chopstick) meal. On those occasions, I felt mildly celebratory about not boiling or microwaving my own dinner. It looks like this meal came in Styrofoam, with a plastic fork. There are…

By Rob McColley to the entry 'Confounding name, delicious food on 02/05/10.

As a relatively recent convert, I very much look forward to dining at this restaurant, and to the rest of your series! An excellent, marvelous idea…thank you!

By RS to the entry 'Confounding name, delicious food on 02/04/10.