
P. Gregory Springer
Writing by P. Gregory Springer has appeared in the New York Times, Variety, the Chicago Sun-Times, CREEM, The Reader, American Film, The Quill, Writer's Digest, High Times, The Advocate, Blueboy, Nation's Business, Film Culture, Boxoffice, Theater Week, Gospel Herald and Torso. Since 1980, he has had one wife and three sons. He is a substitute teacher of Spanish and earns money delivering newspapers. It's all so much chaff in the wind.
I tried to be first in line, but an older couple, obviously having dressed in the dark to beat me, claimed that privilege. It felt good to get it out of the way. Now I can stop studying CNN and the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.
Then, improbably and fortuitously, I broke a tooth. Since I don't have to be around for election day, and since I broke a tooth, I have the perfect excuse to leave the country entirely. I no longer love it, so I am leaving it, just as people have sometimes-not-so-kindly requested of me over the years.
We learned that Macbeth's fatal flaw was ambition. (It is remarkable how similar the story is to the other Mc story in the headlines today, someone also ambitious for power and willing to flip on any issue or abandon any car-wrecked spouse to claw his way up.) I was the true believer. I learned the lesson. Ambition, bad. Got it. I took it literally.
When I found myself wearing a tie and applying for a job with an ad agency at a relatively advanced age (39), the hiring executive asked about my long-term plans. I told him I wasn't ambitious. I just wanted to write the most perfect, functional ad copy imaginable. I had freelanced at other ad agencies for the previous couple of years and it had been fun. This was my first job-job. It meant I'd commute one hour and sit in my own office (8 to 5).
The exec frowned. "Sometimes you have to be ambitious," he warned, "or you don't get anywhere at all."
I didn't understand. Wouldn't the ambitious ones be washing blood off their hands and swearing at spots?
As I practiced exhaling, I composed a letter in my head to the News-Gazette about "fairness." People have been complaining that their letters column is unfair.
"There were ten letters for Obama," someone griped, "and only one for McCain."
Well, I thought. Maybe that is all the letters they received. Should they have printed just one of the Obama letters to make things even? Say they had received ten letters for Sarah Palin and no letters for Joe Biden. Should they not have printed any letters at all, to make things balanced? My answer: yes. I think so. No more letters. Especially letters about Sarah Palin.