Not exactly looking back: an interview with Jason Patterson
![]()
If you live in Champaign-Urbana and you drink coffee, odds are you've encountered Jason Patterson's artwork. His towering canvasses have graced the walls of most every local cafe, but this Friday his solo exhibition Civil Rights Project opens at Indi Go Art Gallery in downtown Champaign with a reception that runs from 7-10 p.m.
Often grappling with lofty subjects such as socio-cultural strife, trauma and the past's presence in our everyday life, Patterson makes use of a sleek, direct aesthetic through the use of iconic imagery and human form. As a result, Patterson's work unpacks the politics, the hope and the latent ambivalence of the Civil Rights Era while simultaneously challenging the contemporary status quo. Civil Rights Project is sure to compile a great deal of Jason's confrontational and evocotive work.
Earlier this week, he took some time away from hanging canvasses to trade a few emails with me.
Smile Politely: I understand that you're hanging your paintings at Indi Go right now in preparation for your opening this Friday. Tell me, what all goes into preparing for a big show like this one?
Jason Patterson: What really got the this Exhibition going was organizing it as a benefit for the Boys & Girls Club. James Barham, the gallery's own, should really get all the credit for that. He got so many sponsors like both cities and the U of I to back it. And he made sure there was good press covering it.
As far as the actual hanging. We started last week and we're almost done. The big challenge will be the hanging of the 15ft by 7ft tapestry that depicts Malcolm X at a debate in England in 1964. Everything else has been pretty easy to get up.
Smile Politely: I've seen your work all over town, and some of it (like that Malcom X piece) is just enormous — one might even call it confrontational. As an artist, what do you get out of working with such large pieces?
Jason Patterson: For me making large work comes pretty organically. I usually don't set out to make a giant painting or drawing. I find an image and I guess I try to use my intuition on figuring the size. A lot of times I try to get the people in my pieces close to life size. I think that give it an even more realistic feel to the work. But I am definitely not averts to making small work. There is one particular piece in this series that is very small.
Smile Politely: When did you first start making art?
Jason Patterson: I've just always loved to draw and paint people. I never really questioned it. Everything else just seemed boring to me growing up and not enough of a challenge.
Smile Politely: That's awesome. You seem to do a great deal of portraiture. What do you try to communicate in your interpretation of people's faces, like in your portrait of Franz Kafka?
Jason Patterson: The Kafka was a Richter copy. The 4 women in this series are also Richter copies (in a way). In 1971-72 Richter painted 48 great European men. I'm doing the same thing but I''m drawing 48 African American women. I have 7 so far and these 4 are in Civil Rights Project.
Smile Politely: How does temporality figure into your work?
Jason Patterson: If you mean temporality in a literal sense... The work should last. In most of these pieces the only thing touching the canvas is charcoal, pastel and acrylic. The acrylic in gesso or gel form. None of these thing will really rot like oil would on raw canvas. So they got a good 100 to 200 years if kept well. Maybe even more.
Now if you mean temporality figuratively... I'm not really sure. I think that's something that can only be found out after time has past. I would like to see what people think about this work 50 or 60 years from now. I think it'd be just as interesting as looking at a series of work about the end of slavery created at the beginning of the 20th century.
Or, actually it could be a bit like this: One of my favor it artist is Jacob Lawrence and in the early 40's he did a series of work called "Migration Series" the work depicted the Great Migration by African Americans from the South to the North, West and Mid-West. This is although a little different because he was making work about an event that had only ended 10 years earlier. But still it is interesting to look back and an artist that was himself looking back.
Smile Politely: A nice answer to a poorly worded question. Do you see your work as "looking back?" And if so, what does it see?
Jason Patterson: In a way. I want people to see the movement the way I tried to see it. As something more contemporary or without the retrospective bias. We all know about how great and moving and righteous it was. I want to talk about those event, though this work, a little differently. I want the viewer to feel like they are in 1968 and they're watching the evening news. So I guess its more like I'm trying to put us back instead of just looking back. I'm trying to let you observe not be told a story.
Smile Politely: As a local artist, do you see your work as being in conversation with your community? And if so, how?
Jason Patterson: I couldn't tell you much about how my work is taken here publicly. I can only say what people have said to me personally. I've mostly only gotten compliments. Some I don't always think are deserving. Its all very humbling.
Photo Credit: Michael Curtin
4 comments
I’m looking forward to Jason’s show, though I’m going to be out of town for the opening.
As for “not looking back,“ I’m going to invoke my right to disagree with the artist about his own work here: some of the work, particularly the Kennedys portrait (which, sorry Jason, drips with nostalgia—not a bad thing, but also not a strictly “60s evening news” thing) and the Richter-influenced work, clearly functions differently than simply involving us in the time of the Civil Rights struggle. By consciously and conspicuously responding to a series of paintings (the 48 European men) that (1) postdates the majority of the Civil Rights movement and more importantly (2) construes its subjects as important historical figures, you are saying something about these women that has a temporal dimension that specifically and necessarily locates us in the present and the women in the past. (That being said, it’s a really cool project and political statement—the last bit again, not quite suggesting any sort of observational neutrality.)
Now, this certainly doesn’t apply to all of the paintings, and I think it makes the paintings I’m talking about any less interesting, but I think that “looking back” is certainly part of some of this work. I’m no art historian, but diptichs and triptychs also speak to me of a form not associated with the 60s, but more with pre-modern painting. I could be wrong in thinking that, but with my limited knowledge, that’s what they say to me, and I think that this form of presentation, if not the content and style of the paintings themselves, also construes their subjects as historical—and even epic and exaltable. I love the diptych of the protestors getting hosed, by the way. Absolutely love it.
So: is Jason dictating a narrative to us with his paintings? I don’t know if I would go that far, but I also wouldn’t say that all of them allow us to “just observe.“ (But I would be disinclined to admit that any work of art allows us to “just observe.“) There are several that I think are more along the lines of what Jason is saying, though.
Finally, and not to be an asshole, but I think the word is “averse.“ Averts is different. So is adverse.
I meant “. . . but I don’t think it makes the paintings I’m talking about any less interesting,“ obviously.
Oh Pat, We’ll have so much to discuss when you come see the show!
To clarafiy for other readers. Civil Rights Project is on the top floor of the gallery. The lower floor, where the Kennedy piece is, is full of studies and other works that built up Civil Rights project.
Can’t wait to see the show Jason! I’ve been waiting 2 years for this!
Most Recent Arts Comments
It’s a total shame this is only during working hours! It sounds great, but I’m one of those who can’t slip away very readily during the 9-to-5. Next time, a request: weekend events, please?
Nuts. Sorry I saw this, um, 15 minutes before CULitFest (my term!) begins. However, one deficit - no beer. SP.com 1, UIUC 0. In all seriousness, hope it goes well!
Good stuff as always! I like the theory Zelina presented…curious to see how it plays out with Sawyer, Jin/Sun, and Kate…
To get back to the show, if that’s allowed, we saw it last night. I know a lot about the films of the 30s and 40s and appreciated what Durang was trying to do, though some was pretty obvious and the ending was forced. A literal kitchen…
I had a great time reading around your post as I read it extensively. Gold Coins
Zeleni, I had the exact same theory only with the mysterious Man in Black/Smokie granting the wishes. MIB promised Sayid he could have anything in the world he wanted, which turned out to be Nadia. Although he does not necessarily “have” her, she has not died yet…
Zelini, I really like this - I’ll try to follow the theory more closely. As they reveal more about Kate (possibly next week), it might give us more perspective. I agree with your observation about Ben and I think Michael Emerson has done an excellent job conveying his lesser stature.
What if the sideways alternatives are where Jacob actually grants them their wishes, but in ways they didn’t quite expect? The elimination of one regret. Sayid gets to be with Nadia - although through his brother. Maybe he ends up with her at the expense of his…
I understood this totally differently than the other people that posted…this is what I got from it: - the more background you have going in, the more of the allusions you will understand when watching - afterwards, you can do a little research to fill in the…
Most Popular Arts Articles (60 days)
- Stories & Beer #1: the recap

- Not exactly looking back: an interview with Jason Patterson

- Stories & Beer: the beginning of something good
- Riddles of time and tale
- “You have what it takes…“
- What lies in the shadow of the statue?
- Discovering local independent media
- Not busy seeing Avatar a fifth time? Maybe you could rent these movies
- The Last Waltz roundtable
- Book review: You are among friends
Most Recent Comments
What is an antibiotic-free egg? And how can you tell?
Great article. I’ve always found that by making it in the blender, I can be my typical impatient self and pour tons of oil in at once. It’s very forgiving that way, though not fool proof.
I will be at Danu this evening. And seeing as tomorrow - St. Pat’s - is my birthday, I will be celebrating with tons of green and fun!
Big Blue will actually be on 6-9, despite what is posted elsewhere. Then, hightail it over to Bentley’s!
Yeeee! This sounds so fun! Any word on covers for any/all of these? Maybe SP could spring for punch cards and some discounts if we make it to all, eh?
Ok, just tell me when I can exhale - Just curious, since all the globalists, carbon traders, and pretty much anyone with copious amounts of wealth have weighed in on population reduction in recent years, i was wondering what yer magic number was. Some of the more…
ESPN360!!!!! For those that don’t know, you can watch the ESPNs’ games on your puter.
...and given the lack of smiley emoticons i chose to employ, that reads far more sarcastically than i ever intended (my apologies). i actually find this to be a great article and an interesting discussion, seriously : )
Once it leaves the basement, it is then called what? hmmm…....could it be mainstream? accessible? appealing on a mass-level? POP??? Quickly it will become a fad, over-saturate the media, and piss people off. Then everyone can write articles based on how that shit sucks, too. chickens are…
So John is seeing all comments as being authored by John. I am seeing all comments as authored by me. The first comment was Mysterious McDade who evidently acquired an Optimism Hat and is now seeing how it fits.
No, everyone is me! Muahahaha! I so didn’t make that first comment so I thought maybe someone was trying to get my goat, adding me to the staff. I hope jumping to that conclusion is forgivable. Yeah, uh, I guess I should say that I swear I…
In general, I think music is much more interesting now than in 1995. I definitely am very glad contemporary music has expanded beyond the four-piece rock lineup that dominated much of the 90’s. The point of the above isn’t so much about a sound or an instrument…
2010 is not 1995. I’m not sure why anyone would expect a music scene to remain stationary as the world of popular music moves around it. Also, today, making popular music with mainstream appeal and being innovative and cutting-edge are usually exact opposites.
I didn’t know that the LED was created here. That’s awesome.
It’s a total shame this is only during working hours! It sounds great, but I’m one of those who can’t slip away very readily during the 9-to-5. Next time, a request: weekend events, please?
Nuts. Sorry I saw this, um, 15 minutes before CULitFest (my term!) begins. However, one deficit - no beer. SP.com 1, UIUC 0. In all seriousness, hope it goes well!
Most Popular Articles (14 days)
- All’s well, no worries, next year will be great!
- Champaign Pop City

- If You’re Bored, Then You’re Boring
- Die another day
- A road in search of a reason
- A folk pop antidote to the drunken plague
- The Plastic Generation
- The Last Waltz roundtable
- Kaiyo a surprising delight for buffet
- “Nice flag, douchebag!“: one man’s quest to run as Lincoln
Recent Searches
- 1889 (1 Results)
- champaign chocolate (37 Results)
- champaign chocolate (37 Results)
- justin martin (10 Results)
- 1687 (13 Results)
- neoga blacksmith (26 Results)
- 1687 (13 Results)
- 1840 (1 Results)
- 1880 (1 Results)
- stories beer (35 Results)
- 2020 (1 Results)
- 1840 (1 Results)
- 1933 (1 Results)
- 1901 (1 Results)
- 1889 (1 Results)
- caleb curtiss (14 Results)
- jet w lee (51 Results)
- joke (187 Results)
- cartoons (14 Results)
- stories beer (35 Results)

Facebook
Twitter
Full Site























I didn’t know that the LED was created here. That’s awesome.