Foreskin stories: Pt. 1
I recently fell into the habit of asking my male friends about their penises. Not having unlimited access to one myself, I'm curious about what it's like to not only have a penis, but to have a penis that is different from the penis one was born with. Why are some of my friends circumcised while others aren't, and what prompts some parents to opt out of such a standardized procedure? Interestingly, these questions are usually met with excitement and enthusiasm from guy pals as we suddenly become engrossed in conversations about how their appendages came to look the way they did. I've gained so much insight into the private world of my friends' private parts that I started asking the same questions to new and expecting parents.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates about 30% of men are circumcised worldwide, yet the procedure of removing the foreskin (usually within 48 hours of birth) is general practice in American hospitals, with an estimated 60-75% of American-born males circumcised every year. While circumcision has been ritualized by many religions for centuries, its non-religious practice became popularized in American hospitals by the 1930s. The alleged health and hygiene benefits of foreskin removal have been heartily challenged in recent decades with the advent of frequent bathing and new developments in understanding the acquisition of sexually transmitted infections. Human rights groups have contested the acceptance of circumcision as a "normal" practice, citing consent, physical pain and emotional trauma as a few of the many ethical dilemmas inherent in conducting the procedure on male infants. However, advocates argue health benefits of circumcision not only outweigh the risks, but the simple procedure has become so common in the U.S. that many parents fear a non-circumcised child will be teased about his foreskin.
Without engaging in the debate of whether one option is better or worse than the other, I was delighted that five male friends and three parenting couples were willing to share their foreskin stories with me. One could assume a random sampling of males I know would yield fewer foreskinned friends than circumcised, but of the five males I asked to talk about their penises, four are uncut.
Foreskin frenzy
Edward (24, graduate student), Nathan (28, IT), Matthew (31, graduate student) and Hoss (26, Lawyer) were all brave enough to shed some light on a few of the questions I had about being American males with foreskins.
Emma Reaux: Okay guys, I don't have a penis. Tell me what it's like to have one.
Edward: 95% of the day you don't notice it. Every now and then, you have to adjust, due to sitting in an awkward position or an involuntary erection. Also, it makes peeing easier, and you can write fun things in the snow.
Nathan: Zippers are a little dangerous at times, but other than that I really have no complaints.
Matthew: Women like it when I put it in them, which works great because I like putting it in them.
Hoss: The world is my toilet! Also, my penis has gotten me into a lot of trouble, because it has an amazing ability to control my thoughts.
ER: When did you first notice that not every male child has a foreskin?
E: The first time I saw my best friend in elementary school naked.
N: When I was seven, I walked in on my best friend changing and noticed he was not quite the same as I.
ER: What conversations did you have with your parents as a child, teen, or adult about not being circumcised?
H: My mom is Jewish which makes it all the weirder to have an anteater, but she said she and my dad had a conversation and thought that circumcision was barbaric and did not want to put my brother or myself through it, though obviously we would not have remembered.
N: My parents were not very open about sexuality or anything related to it, but they made sure I knew how to keep myself clean and healthy.
M: I was actually born in Europe, where most people are uncut, so this was never brought up.
ER: Why did your parents choose not to circumcise you? (If you haven't asked, call up right now and ask your mother!)
N: My parents decided not to have it done for multiple reasons. Since my first conversation about this with you, I have learned that my father is not circumcised. I was also born premature, so any unnecessary risks to my health were avoided, especially surgical procedures like circumcision. Neither of them had any strong religious convictions either way and decided together that they didn't want it done.
M: Europeans don't believe in genital mutilation (or free soda refills).
E: The answer, as I recall, was something along the lines of "we didn't see any point in it."
ER: Do you have brothers? Are they circumcised? What about your father?
E: I am almost positive my brother and father are not circumcised.
N: My brother, like me, is uncircumcised. My father is not. I didn't find this out until recently.
M: No siblings, and my father has his foreskin. My family has a strong tradition of not chopping off body parts upon birth.
H: My brother is not circumcised, but my dad is.
ER: Many arguments for circumcision (outside of religious contexts) cite hygiene issues and increased risk of STI transmission for those with foreskins. Did you ever feel you were at an increased risk for poor health outcomes due to your foreskin? 
N: I am a pretty clean guy, and have never had a problem with keeping it clean. I have never had an STI, but that may have more to do with being selective about my partners and always using condoms and safer sex practices.
M: Hygiene was never an issue: everything gets washed just like any other body part. As far as an increased risk of STI transmission, even if those studies are correct, they are often done on populations where condom use is scarce. So they're not applicable to the safe-sex practicing gentleman such as myself.
H: I worried for a bit as an adolescent, because I heard the stories, but I think it just makes you more cognizant of the risks, so you take better care of it. In that sense, it is almost healthier, if I may be so bold as to claim.
E: I have circumcised friends who tried to convince me that I was at greater risk, but I have come to the conclusion that this is just common opinion, rather than the result of their own research. So I've decided that no, I'm not really at risk. Admittedly, I haven't done much research myself.
ER: What are your thoughts about the assumption that circumcision is just "normal" in our culture and that "most" males are circumcised, so we should just keep up with the practice?
H: I would agree, it has definitely become the norm, even outside of religious contexts, and you feel a little weird being different. Some girls are into it though, because it is different. I have had several girlfriends play with it, just out of curiosity, like they are seeing a penis for the first time.
M: There are good traditions and there are bad traditions. Given how much the foreskin enhances pleasure, I find it unreasonable to support the practice of circumcision. Besides, if someone wants, he can get circumcised at any point in his adult life.
ER: Many parents who are trying to decide about circumcision for their male children worry about teasing in the locker room, or similar scenarios. Did you ever experience anything like this, and how did you handle it?
E: I don't know if I've been overtly teased, but I have felt "different" for most of my life. The guys I've told about it have usually acted surprised, as if being uncircumcised is bizarre and unorthodox. It has made me, and continues to make me, a bit self-conscious in locker rooms.
N: In all the schools I went to everyone was very modest, and more apt to make fun of you for "being gay" if you even looked at some else while getting dressed. We actually were only required to take showers before and after swim class, and we did that in swimsuits, so no real problems ever arose.
M: While I did not, I'm sure that others have. But so what? Fat kids, short kids, and ginger kids get made fun of as well, but you don't see many mothers eager to cut off little Timmy's belly fat.
H: I never experienced any teasing in the locker room. Most guys are already awkward being naked groups, and then it just turns into all of the regular locker room shenanigans. Plus, guys are assholes to begin with, and there is never a dearth of things to make fun of their buddies for, so potential teasing is not really a good reason to circumcise.
ER: How has having a foreskin impacted your personal pleasure and/or sex with yourself?
H: Allegedly, you get greater sensitivity from not being circumcised. I obviously only have the one penis, so I can't really compare.
M: It's a lot easier to masturbate if you have foreskin, since the sliding action of the skin means that you might not require as much lubricant. The foreskin is also very sensitive, providing for more pleasure while masturbating.
ER: How has it impacted your sex life with others?
E: This is where I think my case is somewhat unique. My foreskin is abnormally tight about the tip, which makes retraction uncomfortable when flaccid and impossible when erect or partially erect. For this reason I don't clean under the foreskin as often as I probably should, but I have never experienced an unnatural buildup of dirt or smegma. My foreskin is fine when masturbating, but sex requires lubrication, and even then care must be taken when penetrating so that the foreskin does not pull too tightly.
H: It has never prevented me from sleeping with someone, but there is a brief consideration in the beginning and invariably a conversation about it. Anyone who is sleeping with me has to be understanding anyway, and forgiving, so it is never a deal breaker.
M: Most of my experiences were positive. Only once was someone confused by it after the fact, but that didn't affect the experience. Everyone else was either excited or neutral.
ER: Has it increased communication with partners?
M: Since a lot of women asked me if they needed to do anything differently while performing oral sex, I'd say that being uncut has helped with communication. The answer is no, by the way.
H: Outside of normal conversations about girth, flavor and length, it is a conversation piece at the head of your penis, which probably leads to more open sexual conversations, including talks about STIs.
E: My partner and I have certainly discussed circumcision and the issues my tight foreskin causes with respect to sex. She has also encouraged me to make sure I am clean so that I don't give her any sort of infection.
ER: Is it something you tell partners about before the pants come off, or do you just let them figure it out?
N: I used to tell them beforehand, but when I stopped treating it like it was a big deal, it usually no longer was.
M: I rarely mention it. When the penis is erect, one retracts the foreskin and there's no difference between cut and uncut males. When the condom is put on, there's no difference at all. Otherwise, like with oral sex, women have figured it out just fine.
H: I always let them figure it out. If you stop before taking your pants off it makes it a much bigger deal than it actually is, and makes the other person more aware of it than if they just find out for themselves.
ER: Have you ever had a partner who reacted very strongly (negatively or otherwise) to your foreskin?
M: I've had some women get excited since they've never had sex with an uncut guy. Seems to be kind of a novelty 'round these parts.
H: Nothing outside of curiosity. I once had a girl drunkenly throw me on a bed and start unzipping my pants as she said, "I want to see your penis." That was pretty awesome, but is really the only memorable reaction.
N: I have had both negative and positive reactions. The negative reactions were never really all that bad-more or less a look of surprise that caught me off guard, or maybe a small comment because the partner had never been with someone uncircumcised. No one has ever been mean to me about it, or refrained from having sex with me because of it. A recent partner actually made me feel good about it, which is a welcome first. I was surprised when she said she thought it was "awesome" that I am uncircumcised. I haven't felt as comfortable with previous partners as I have been with her.
ER: Have you ever considered getting a circumcision? If so, what thoughts or events led you to that consideration? If not, describe why you are totally comfortable with being uncircumcised.
E: Because of my tight foreskin, I have considered getting a circumcision in order to make intercourse easier, but at this point, it's not worth it to me.
N: Yes, I have considered it. I think everyone worries if they are "normal." I really couldn't bare the thought of actually having what I feel is unnecessary surgery to "fit in."
M: Based on my experiences, the fact that I'm uncut plays virtually no role in my sex life with others, and only enhances the pleasure. I'm totally comfortable with being uncircumcised.
H: I have thought about it, but the pain and money have been deterrents. By now it is just one of those things I have, but maybe someday I would.

ER: If you had a son, would you circumcise him? Why/why not?
N: Absolutely not. Some people would go as far to say that its genital mutilation, but I just can't see any reason to remove something evolution has granted him to have.
E: Probably not, for the same reason my parents didn't, I see no compelling reason.
M: No, I'd want him to make the choice.
H: I think I would, for the normalcy of it, especially by the time I pop out kids. And while it would be difficult to see a son in pain, I think that in the end it is probably the right choice. I don't have a real justification for it, it just feels right.
ER: What would you like to tell couples and future parents who are weighing the options about circumcising their sons?
E: You could circumcise your son in order to ensure he doesn't get teased about his foreskin, but kids always get teased about something, so I don't see this as a good reason. Unless you have a good reason, religious or health-related, I'd say don't bother.
N: This is a fairly personal decision, but if you are worried about your child being disadvantaged in any way, don't. I have lived a perfectly normal and wonderful life with my foreskin intact and I can't comment on what it would be like without it, but I enjoy the way things are and wouldn't change that part of my body for any reason.
H: It is a personal decision based on a lot of factors, so it is not really for me to say. It has not negatively or positively affected my life that greatly, so if you think it is right one way or the other that is the choice you should make.
M: Don't buy into the stupid arguments about cleanliness or whatever else people say to keep up this outdated tradition. A dirty circumcised penis is still a dirty penis, so you're much better off teaching kids about hygiene. Keep the turtleneck on, and be proud!
Check back tomorrow for Part 2 when I ask new and expecting parents about the process of deciding their sons' foreskin futures.
19 comments
I have heard tell that University of Florida football star and Heisman Trophy winner Tim Tebow would be more than happy to circumsize your child…you know, if you’re interested.
Rich
C’mon curtis, don’t be a dick. (sorry)
If you ever have to go to physical therapy and change in the locker room, you will find a seemingly willing library of specimens for investigation over the age of 55.
The locker room at the Champaign Park District indoor tennis facility is a good bet, as well.
coda916
My question: Is “more sensitivity” a good thing or a bad thing?
And sure evolution has given us the foreskin but who needs it with undergarments and pants protecting our peters?
Peppino P
“Treat Your Penis As If It Were an Athlete”
Peppino, the spokes-penis, says that your penis, just like an athlete, needs vitamins, supplements and minerals in order to provide peak performance and always to be in top shape. Hear what Peppino has to say about which penis-specific vitamins are necessary to maintain penis health and keep your sexual performance at a winning competitive level. See and hear Peppino at http://www.man1health.com
Matthew
coda916:
My question: Is “more sensitivity” a good thing or a bad thing?
Restate your question as: “Is feeling more pleasure during sex a good thing or a bad thing?“ and you might see an answer youself.
And sure evolution has given us the foreskin but who needs it with undergarments and pants protecting our peters?
For those of us who are not Mormon, skinny dipping and sleeping naked are still regular occurrences. Besides, “I wear underwear” is not a very convincing argument for chopping off body parts; it presupposes that the foreskin is there only for protection and nothing else. In reality, a foreskin is a comfortable apartment my penis. He likes it, especially since his close neighbor is an asshole.
coda916
I guess I was thinking in terms of stamina as far as sensitivity is concerned. One would assume the more pleasure one receives the more likely you become a “one-pump-chump.“ But perhaps you make up for it in girth so it doesn’t matter…your wife still gets pleasure and it doesn’t take as long. I don’t know…
I hadn’t heard the “comfortable apartment” argument before…I guess I don’t know what I’m missing! I’ve just read from scientists that they presupposed the foreskin’s use for protection from tall grasses and such while walking. That kind of follows the line for swimming too I guess…protection from parasites and whatnot.
I kind of see them like wisdom teeth. Something evolution gave us but that we really have no use for anymore. Like I said, maybe I don’t know what I’m missing…
Restoring Tally
@coda916: Like I said, maybe I don’t know what I’m missing…
I think that sums it up. I was circumcised at birth and I am restoring my foreskin. Mathew above has the right idea. It is much more pleaurable to have a foreskin, even a restored one. The forskin provides a gliding action as the glans moves in and out inside the foreskin. Along with the normal sensitivity of an intact penis, the feeling is very pleasurable and I can do it just as long as I want. I don’t need lube, and my wife never gets sore from extended sessions. :)
Also, the glans and inner foreskin are mucous membranes. That is the same type of tissue as under your eyelids. For infants who were recently circumcised, having their sensitive bits rub against their diaper is very irritating. For boys and men, the glans and inner foreskin remnant keratinizes (develops a calloused layer) and it is less irritating. But, it still bothered me for a long time to have my bare glans rub against my underwear and bedsheets.
Oops. I noticed that the link I posted above is broken. Here is the link to learn more about foreskin restoration. I am very satisfied with my restored foreskin and find it much more pleasurable than when I was circumcised.
STail
My dad elected to get circumcised in his late teens due to locker room peer pressure. He deeply regretted the pain and loss of sensation afterward, and so when I was born, he didn’t allow the hospital to circumsize me. Thank goodness! I love my foreskin!
Tasha
I have to say, I prefer an uncut guy. I am sure there are women who feel both ways about it, but I feel strongly that uncut is the way to stay for men.
sam
<h4 class=“user_name”>coda916-</h4>
to say that the foreskin is only serves a protective purpose is wrong. it is not a numb piece of skin covering the glans when the penis is not in use and completely separate from the rest of it. it is part of the penis: it is a double-walled piece of flesh made up of muscle, veins, skin and mucosa (the stuff your cheeks and lips are made out of), and is covered in tens of thousands of fine-touch sensitive nerves. just as various parts of female genitalia serve both a protective and sexual role, so does the foreskin. to dismiss it as merely protective is silly, because simply looking at the plain facts, which is that the foreskin has a huge amount of sexually sensitive nerve endings, shows the foreskin to serve a sexual function.
it isn’t that intact men are more sensitive, it is that they literally have more to feel. they are in complete possession of the equipment to potentially feel all of the erotic sensations nature intended us to feel. circumcised men only have the glans and the shaft, both of which have nerves that respond much more to pressure, as opposed to the earlier mentioned fine-touch nerves of the foreskin.
i do not want to make it seem like i think circumcised men are doomed to crummy sex, but they are missing out on a whole bunch of awesome nerves (not to mention extra skin so they can get erections without everything going taut). it seems to me that a lot of circumcised men have the attitude of “well it must not be useful in any way because they wouldn’t just cut it off if it was.“ the unfortunate fact is that it is part of a male’s sexual organ and is specially suited to receiving pleasure. this is the dirty little secret of this debate: by circumcising infants we are taking future sexual pleasure away from the men they will become. we are altering the sexual organs of babies, oftentimes for no more than the stated reason of “it just feels right” or “i don’t want my son to have an ugly penis (!!!)“. even the most commonly cited medical reasonings behind it add some protection against risks and conditions most men will never face, circumcised or not.
Prankish
I was uncut up to the age of 26 and decided to get circumcised just out of interest and curiosity. I think sex feels much better now because I can feel the ‘out’ stroke much easier and the out stroke feels better always than the in stroke. There is less ‘hyper sensitivity’ but more ‘good sensation’. It is hard to describe exactly. My girlfriend who had not been with a cut guy before also much prefers the feeling and spontaneous oral sex is now possible without worrying if I might smell or should take a shower first. I can always pee straight without always having to retract the foreskin. Cleaning is no longer a seperate specific task every morning in the shower. Everything is better IMO.
My reasons were simply because I find it more of a turn on. Health reasons were of no motivational factor, but they are an extra bonus. I very much realise this on very hot days.
circmom
sam, you are sadly misinformed or disillusioned. There are no muscles in the foreskin. Having performed many a circ in our office, I assure you, no muscle. it is nothing like your cheek or lips. both my boys are circumcized. as long as you care properly for a fresh circumcision, there is no irritation, only a small incision that heals rapidly due to ample blood flow to the area. I prefer a circumcized male… I like to see what I’m getting. No turtlenecks for me. thanks.
Prankish
@circmom, sam can say all he wants about thousands of nerve endings and such, but it is irrelevant. I am one of the few that have been there and done that so to speak, and I know that the foreskin is more of a liability than an asset. Not only do I know this, but on the newsgroups I visit dedicated to adult circ I would say from what I have seen the satisfaction rate post-circ is 99%+.
Pre-circ there is too much sensitivity to properly enjoy sensations where close to orgasm becomes simply too much, and after orgasm is painfully-sensitive. Post-circ there is less sensitivity (in a good way) which is in no way any more ultra-sensitive, however, there is MORE feeling. Both of this, makes it much improved.
Without the frenulum, the fear of tearing from rough sex is gone, which is also much better without that mental turn-off. The zone where the frenulum was is now an added area of pleasure. I also have a very tight circ so the frenulum needed to be removed for the head to remain straight and not bend downward, which looks awful. I also had a scrotal web resection which removes the turkey neck of skin between the bottom of the shaft and scrotum. I have a tight and neat package as a whole now which is a whole lot different to before the surgery. My surgeon takes special consideration to cosmetic outcome and is an MD and does many adult circs, and it is quite difficult to find such a qualified surgeon who does many adult circs. He did do a very good job with a perfect circle circ line, but with that being said even with the best surgeon it still takes much longer for an adult circ to heal vs an infant circ. Adult circs can take a year to take on final appearance where infant circs healed in weeks.
Sarah
I gotta say folks, I’ve had partners both cut and uncut and both are fine in my book. As the female partner, I couldn’t tell a difference and hygiene was never an issue. I suspect technique and experience have more to do with it than if the member has been circumcised or left with foreskin.
I do find it strange that someone called “circmom” would reply with promoting circumcision in her own office and yet she can’t even properly spell circumcision (there is no “z” in it). Then she says her boys are circumcised and that’s what she sexually prefers to see. What? She isn’t looking at her own children sexually, is she?
I have no idea if this woman is crazy or just a troll. But it may be the strangest comment I’ve read on the web in a while, and that’s saying something.
Prankish
^^Why would wanting to pass on a positive experience or opinion about the subject be wrong to choose it for your son if you truly believe it is what is best? Parents choose what is best for their children and circ is just another parenting choice that parents deserve to have without being judged. It doesn’t matter what the reasons are. Why would the reason of thinking it is better from a sexual standpoint be any less valid than say religious millenia old stone age superstitious reasons?
Don Collapso
<span lang=“EN-GB”><span style=“font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: small;“>So quite right - parents choose what’s right for their children, but is having an unnecessary, mutilating operation (so the rest of the world thinks) inflicted on your child ok?<span style=“mso-spacerun: yes;“> </span>It is certainly understandable because generations of Americans have got used to the idea that circumcision is ok, but when they hear what we have to say about it and foreign porn (or foreign GFs) tell you what an asset and a luxury it is to have one, isn’t it time that more of you started challenging this outmoded and barbaric practice?</span></span>
<span lang=“EN-GB”><span style=“font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: small;“>I speak from the heart.<span style=“mso-spacerun: yes;“> </span>It used to be practised in the UK to a limited extent and I was one of the last generation to have to face this mutilation.<span style=“mso-spacerun: yes;“> </span>I never forgave my parents after being made fun of at school and by my first GF.<span style=“mso-spacerun: yes;“> </span>In later life I realised that sex was no longer in any way rewarding and I more or less gave up.<span style=“mso-spacerun: yes;“> </span>My poor scarred stump now has no more sensitivity than a stick of celery - and I resent it. </span></span>
<span lang=“EN-GB”><span style=“font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: small;“>Check out Norm-UK (Google it) if you think I’m some sort of one-off or fruitcake.</span></span>
<span lang=“EN-GB”><span style=“font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: small;“>Then eat your heart out, like so many Americans do when the truth dawns what they’ve been deprived of.</span></span>
Kat
I feel strongly that parents should not circ their boys….every individual should have the right to an intact body and decide for themselves in the future if they would like to have any type of cosmetic procedure. My hubby n son are happily intact:)
Most Recent Culture Comments
Bobo was amazing; she threaded right through opponents in front of her like they weren’t there. I think the bout could have easily gone the other way if she hadn’t been skating for the Dames.
OHNO BOBO definitely made her mark with the Damgin’ Dames!! Great bout Friday night at Savoy Rec Center!!! TCDG is doing a great job bringing Flat Track Derby to the area! Keep up the good work and the crowds will come!
Mark, your first paragraph is mostly wrong. The second paragraph is true, though. Hulten has been a conflict of interest from Day One. The Champaign City Council made a big mistake in appointing him. The other two candidates were a lot better, a lot more intelligent, and far less biased.
I regularly commented at IP.com several moons ago, and I didn’t get the same impression of Gordy Hulten as the commenter above. While there were times when his conservative bias incapacitated his reading comprehension skills, for the most part he was a patient and kind moderator who…
“Glock 21, an IlliniPundit regular has described the new incarnation of the site as “dead blog walking”.“ Glock21 is an example of “brain-dead man walking.“ “The site had its strengths and weaknesses ...“ Mostly weaknesses, though. The main strength was tipping us off there are many, many…
Glock 21, an IlliniPundit regular has described the new incarnation of the site as “dead blog walking”. The activity and updates have come to a stand still. The site had its strengths and weaknesses, but was a good barometer of what the landed gentry were thinking. They…
If you liked last week’s SameSexSunday—you’ll love this week’s! http://bit.ly/91zLi0
“ChampaignPundit” is a pretty broken site—effectively, you can’t sign up for an account, because there’s no way to specify or change a password. That means you either do the email “reset my password” thing to get a temporary password every time you want to make a comment,…
I think the nutballs knew that all their crazy theories would be accepted and embraced. That parade argument was a great example. Never mind that unsafe conditions created a hazard to participants and bystanders—IT WAS A TERRIBLE DECISION TO CANCEL IT!@!!!!!!! Or at least that’s what the…
Most Popular Culture Articles (60 days)
- Remembering Daniel Schreiber
- CU Pride Fest Preview

- Odyssey Project seeks applicants
- Meet the new blog on the block
- The insect worlds of Alex Wild
- CU Pride Fest review
- A busy summer for Twin City Derby Girls
- The Rainbow Connection: July 5–11
- Flying green, veganism, and the pleasure of food
- The Business of Being Born
Most Recent Comments
Illinois has simply had no luck at all in these Mizzou games. None. I think maybe we’re do for a couple of bounces to go our way. If we get one or two (or sever or eight) breaks, I think it’s a win.
Jason, Savoy could easily join the CPL tax district, which is probably closer to most Savoy residents than the Tolono library is. But my impression is that Savoy residents as a whole don’t want to pay the cost of the CPL (Tolono’s library taxes are cheaper), even…
Sorry, but I am lagging behind on updates to the map. Also, some construction projects were delayed from their original start date. On a more positive note, I am putting together a map of haunted houses in Central Illinois. I have a few plotted already, and I…
I’ve never gotten the privilege of all the services CPL cardholders get. I just want to be able to go out of my way to drive to the CPL to check out books, pay fines, maybe buy some coffee, and enjoy the library. None of those activities…
These days, there is more to using a library than checking out books. At one time, paying into the Lincoln Trails system probably would cover the expenses incurred by other libraries in the system. Now, with Internet, videos, coffee shops, wireless Internet hubs, etc., I suspect the…
(speaking as a Savoy resident) By paying taxes to support a member of the LTLS, we are paying our “fair share” to use any LTLS library—Tolono, Champaign, Urbana, etc. This is how library systems work. The 6% of CPL’s circulation represented by Tolono users is NOT significant…
I would be interested to hear more about the “word on the street”—how are individual hauling companies fulfilling their promise to recycle?
Timbo makes a smart, sound argument. Reread it.
I joined on 09-09-09 after living here over a year, and having to listen to my dad tell me how his best friend is, like, #27 or something crazy like that, and how said friend never lived further than 50 feet from the Illini Inn while going…
And, I might add, no one is being prevented from using the Champaign library. They are just being asked to pay their fair share if they are going to use it as their primary library.
The equation is pretty simple here. If you want social services, then pay the taxes required to run those social services. These things only work if everyone puts in their fair share. As a heavy user of the Champaign Library, I say bravo to this new policy.
What is the increased marginal cost of serving a resident of Savoy or Mahomet? I suspect negligible. What is the increased revenue to be realized by this new policy? I suspect very little. Aside from these financial aspects, what are the most probable results from this new…
Looks like you are also all members of the killer sideburns club.
Thanks for the article, Ben. I was not familiar with this band until now and even though I won’t be able to attend the show on Friday they are now on my radar. A *good* jam band is hard to find, and these folks appear to fill…
Nice article, love the Dead quote in the beginning. If they can get down here to Central FL I’ll definitely be heading out to the show. Some of my friends have finally stopped wincing when I say “jam band.“ I’ve now tried my best at more descriptive…
@Annie: Yeah, my bad. That was the best part! Drinking + memory exercises = fun @Rob: According to Ask the English Teacher, “My dictionary says ‘drunk’ is an archaic past tense of ‘drink.‘“ We’re all about the new grammar around here.
Katie, have the residents of Savoy and Tolono thought about having their taxes raised a little to help their public library expand? That’s a possibility for them. And then everybody wins.
Most Popular Articles (14 days)
- Camp Rantoul Report: August 20, 2010
- Withershins: the hardest working band in Champaign
- Champaign to close recycling drop-off center

- Pygmalion schedule changes, Emeralds and new Erin Fein project added
- The Burlington Coat Factory Mosque

- Meet the new blog on the block
- CU Pride Fest review
- Flatlander fundraising off to a tasty start
- The right thing changes from state to state
- Garbage doesn’t just “go away”
Recent Searches
- 1592 (7 Results)
- Susan Toalson (3 Results)
- Gabe (4 Results)
- Bond (97 Results)
- Bond (97 Results)
- Gabe (4 Results)
- bond (97 Results)
- bond (97 Results)
- dan schreiber (34 Results)
- gillespie (129 Results)
- Men Against Sexual Violence MASV (1 Results)
- 8684 (1 Results)
- Men Against Sexual Violence MASV (1 Results)
- great cover up doug hoepker (13 Results)
- great cover up (589 Results)
- C-U Circle (32 Results)
- 4130 (1 Results)
- elsinore (123 Results)
- elsinore (123 Results)
- ryan groff elsinore (35 Results)

Facebook
Twitter
Full Site
Events Calendar


























I’ll agree that Gordy tolerated a lot of crap, but his patience wasn’t infinite—hence the banning of the nutcase übertea Wayne Johnson, exactly the kind of guy who gives libertarians the reputation for droolin’ batshittery they have. Gordy was also unwilling to pretend that gaybaiting was a…